著者
斉藤 巧弥
出版者
北海道大学大学院国際広報メディア・観光学院 = Graduate School of International Media, Communication, and Tourism Studies, Hokkaido University
雑誌
国際広報メディア・観光学ジャーナル
巻号頁・発行日
vol.24, pp.21-38, 2017-03-24

This paper aims to analyze reports on keikan in the Yomiuri Shimbun and the Asahi Shimbun, and shed light on how the discourse of keikan changed from the 1870s to the 1910s. Keikan means anal sex primarily between males and was illegal in Japan from 1872 to 1881. The word first appeared in the two newspapers in the 1870s and disappeared in the 1910s. In these forty years, two periods are identified through the distinct patterns that the newspapers showed: 1875-1901 and 1905-1914. In the first period, keikan was associated with violence, crime, and intimate relationships. In the second period, keikan was described as “a problem of delinquent students”, and was counted as one of their wrongdoings. The change of discourse is explained by the characteristics of the newspapers, and the multilayered nature of discourse.
著者
斉藤 巧弥
出版者
北海道大学大学院国際広報メディア・観光学院
雑誌
国際広報メディア・観光学ジャーナル
巻号頁・発行日
no.29, pp.37-53, 2019-10-24

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the characteristics of love stories in gay manga and to discuss the identity of gay men in today' s Japan. Since gay manga are created by and for gay men, they can be regarded as representing and constructing a gay identity which reflects their authors' and consumers' real desires and concerns. Focusing on love stories, which have long been the main theme of gay manga, the analysis shows that stories before the 1990s and after the 2000s differ in the contents and causes of gay men' s suffering, their depiction of the heteronormative society, and the types of communities they are located in. Recent works do not deal with heteronormative society and instead reveal gay men' s ambivalent feeling with belonging to and keeping distance from the gay community.
著者
斉藤 巧弥
出版者
北海道大学大学院国際広報メディア・観光学院
雑誌
国際広報メディア・観光学ジャーナル
巻号頁・発行日
vol.29, pp.37-53, 2019-10-24

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the characteristics of love stories in gay manga and to discuss the identity of gay men in today' s Japan. Since gay manga are created by and for gay men, they can be regarded as representing and constructing a gay identity which reflects their authors' and consumers' real desires and concerns. Focusing on love stories, which have long been the main theme of gay manga, the analysis shows that stories before the 1990s and after the 2000s differ in the contents and causes of gay men' s suffering, their depiction of the heteronormative society, and the types of communities they are located in. Recent works do not deal with heteronormative society and instead reveal gay men' s ambivalent feeling with belonging to and keeping distance from the gay community.
著者
斉藤 巧弥
出版者
関東社会学会
雑誌
年報社会学論集 (ISSN:09194363)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2018, no.31, pp.24-35, 2018-08-25 (Released:2019-08-29)
参考文献数
16

This paper examines how the editorial focus of the Japanese gay magazine Badi has shifted over time and how the magazine has shaped the identity of gay men in Japan. Badi is the most popular magazine for gay men in Japan today. Its creation in 1993 coincided with a period of marked change in Japanese society regarding views toward homosexuality as well as with several watershed events such as in 1991 when homophobia was first addressed in a Japanese court and in 1994 when the first pride parade was held in Tokyo. By examining Badi as part of the Japanese gay liberation movement of the 1990s, and dividing the magazine’s editorial run into four distinct periods, we show that although the editors shaped the new identity and lifestyle, they were bolstered by masculinity.
著者
斉藤 巧弥
出版者
北海道大学大学院国際広報メディア・観光学院 = Graduate School of International Media, Communication, and Tourism Studies, Hokkaido University
雑誌
国際広報メディア・観光学ジャーナル = The journal of international media, communication, and tourism studies : JIMCTS
巻号頁・発行日
no.24, pp.21-38, 2017

This paper aims to analyze reports on keikan in the Yomiuri Shimbun and the Asahi Shimbun, and shed light on how the discourse of keikan changed from the 1870s to the 1910s. Keikan means anal sex primarily between males and was illegal in Japan from 1872 to 1881. The word first appeared in the two newspapers in the 1870s and disappeared in the 1910s. In these forty years, two periods are identified through the distinct patterns that the newspapers showed: 1875-1901 and 1905-1914. In the first period, keikan was associated with violence, crime, and intimate relationships. In the second period, keikan was described as "a problem of delinquent students", and was counted as one of their wrongdoings. The change of discourse is explained by the characteristics of the newspapers, and the multilayered nature of discourse.
著者
斉藤 巧弥
出版者
関東社会学会
雑誌
年報社会学論集 (ISSN:09194363)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2018, no.31, pp.24-35, 2018

<p>This paper examines how the editorial focus of the Japanese gay magazine <i>Badi</i> has shifted over time and how the magazine has shaped the identity of gay men in Japan. <i>Badi</i> is the most popular magazine for gay men in Japan today. Its creation in 1993 coincided with a period of marked change in Japanese society regarding views toward homosexuality as well as with several watershed events such as in 1991 when homophobia was first addressed in a Japanese court and in 1994 when the first pride parade was held in Tokyo. By examining <i>Badi</i> as part of the Japanese gay liberation movement of the 1990s, and dividing the magazine's editorial run into four distinct periods, we show that although the editors shaped the new identity and lifestyle, they were bolstered by masculinity.</p>
著者
斉藤 巧弥
出版者
お茶の水女子大学ジェンダー研究所
雑誌
ジェンダー研究 = Journal of gender studies, Ochanomizu University (ISSN:13450638)
巻号頁・発行日
no.22, pp.131-149, 2019

本稿は、1990年代の日本におけるLGBT の社会運動においてゲイとレズビアンが共に活動をする中、どのような差異が両者の間で問題となっていたのかを論じる。分析対象として、北海道札幌市で1989 年から2000 年代初期にかけて活動をしていた団体" 札幌ミーティング" を取り上げる。札幌ミーティングではゲイとレズビアンが共に活動をしていたが、両者の間には差異もあった。ひとつは、新しいコミュニティとしての札幌ミーティングを、コミュニケーションの場として利用することに対する認識の違いであった。もうひとつは、抗議活動と自己の内面に向き合う活動のバランスをめぐる認識の違いであった。これらの差異は両者の対立にもつながり、その背景には、両者の間にあるジェンダーの違いが必ずしもゲイ男性に認識されていたわけではないこと、両者が各自のアイデンティティを重視していたため、このような差異を積極的に共有・議論するに至らなかったという事情があった。投稿論文