著者
田坂 登美 平賀 聖悟 北村 真 飯田 宜志 黒川 順二 飛田 美穂 佐藤 威
出版者
社団法人 日本泌尿器科学会
雑誌
日本泌尿器科學會雑誌 (ISSN:00215287)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.77, no.9, pp.1506-1510, 1986-09-20 (Released:2010-07-23)
参考文献数
8

最近, 日本人の精巣重量およびサイズ等に関して検討を行なった報告は, ほとんど見られない. 今回, われわれは, 747例の変死体剖検症例を対象として, そのうちの651例について精巣重量とサイズの検索を行なった.重量, 厚さはp<0.01で右の方が大きく, 20~49歳の平均精巣重量は左14.53±4.07g, 右15.35±4.26g, 平均サイズは左長径4.51±0.64cm, 短径3.04±0.43cm, 厚さ1.43±0.3cmで, 右長径4.53±0.61cm, 短径3.05±0.4cm, 厚さ1.55±0.33cmであった. また両側精巣とも重量, 長径, 短径で30歳代が最大との結果が得られた.
著者
田坂 登美 平賀 聖悟 北村 真 飯田 宜志 黒川 順二 飛田 美穂 佐藤 威
出版者
社団法人日本泌尿器科学会
雑誌
日本泌尿器科學會雜誌 (ISSN:00215287)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.77, no.9, pp.1506-1510, 1986-09-20

最近,日本人の精巣重量およびサイズ等に関して検討を行なった報告は,ほとんど見られない.今回,われわれは,747例の変死体剖検症例を対象として,そのうちの651例について精巣重量とサイズの検索を行なった.重量,厚さはp<0.01で右の方が大きく,20〜49歳の平均精巣重量は左14.53±4.07g,右15.35±4.26g,平均サイズは左長径4.51±0.64cm,短径3.04±0.43cm,厚さ1.43±0.3cmで,右長径4.53±0.61cm,短径3.05±0.4cm,厚さ1.55±0.33cmであった.また両側精巣とも重量,長径,短径で30歳代が最大との結果が得られた.
著者
川上 純子 三上 憲子 飛田 美穂 倉田 康久 兵藤 透
出版者
相模女子大学
雑誌
相模女子大学紀要. B, 自然系 (ISSN:09167676)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.76, pp.1-6, 2012

Objective : To investigate the limit of validity of assessment of nutritional risk by using serum albumin values, which is handily used for assessing nutrition risk of patients, and explore feasible tools for high risk patients, by comparing index of serum albumin values and other assessment tools : Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) as a well validated nutrition screening and assessment tool, Barthel Index (BI) as an index of activities of daily living, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) as a tool for assessing patients functional impairment, and Geriatric Nutritional risk Index (GNRI) as based on serum albumin values and the discrepancy between real and ideal weight for the elderly. Subjects : Seventy outpatients at a dialysis institution in Kanagawa prefecture (40 male, 30 female) ; mean age 68.0 ± 10.4 (male 67.9 ± 10.1, female 68.4 ± 11.0). Methods : 1. Examined correlation among outcomes of MNA-SF, BI, KPS, GNRI tools, and also between these outcomes and serum albumin values as an index of Objective Dietary Assessment. 2. Examined outcomes (scores) of MNA-SF methods and GNRI methods with regards to patients of serum albumin values under 3.4 g/dl. Results : (N=70) Correlation between assessment tools; (1) between MNA-SF scores and KPS scores, r=0.4952, p<0.001, (2) between serum albumin values and KPS scores, r=0.3693, p<0.01, (3) between serum albumin values and BI scores, r=0.0819, p=0.5. For patients with albumin values under 3.4 g/dl ; four male : mean albumin value, 3.1± 0.5 g/dl, mean GNRI score, 81.4 ± 6.9 (classified as major risk), five female : mean albumin value, 3.2 ± 0.2 g/dl, mean GNRI score, 89.7 ± 8.2 (classified as moderate risk). Discussion and Conclusion : Based on MNA-SF, which is a well validated nutrition screening and assessment tool, its scores had the higher correlation with KPS scores than the other tool's scores, while weak correlation was found between serum albumin values and KPS scores. It was also found that there was a possibility that BI was not related with serum albumin values. Serum albumin value may be a feasible screening tool of nutritional risk of dialysis outpatients, as it may reflect disease prognosis and severity. However, it alone may not reflect ADL of these patients. Therefore, among these methods, MNA-SF method may have possibility of adequately assessing patients' overall physical condition, while BI method was suggested that it may have possibility for assessing specifically patients' ADL.