著者

Akihiko Nogami Takashi Kurita Haruhiko Abe Kenji Ando Toshiyuki Ishikawa Katsuhiko Imai Akihiko Usui Kaoru Okishige Kengo Kusano Koichiro Kumagai Masahiko Goya Yoshinori Kobayashi Akihiko Shimizu Wataru Shimizu Morio Shoda Naokata Sumitomo Yoshihiro Seo Atsushi Takahashi Hiroshi Tada Shigeto Naito Yuji Nakazato Takashi Nishimura Takashi Nitta Shinichi Niwano Nobuhisa Hagiwara Yuji Murakawa Teiichi Yamane Takeshi Aiba Koichi Inoue Yuki Iwasaki Yasuya Inden Kikuya Uno Michio Ogano Masaomi Kimura Shun-ichiro Sakamoto Shingo Sasaki Kazuhiro Satomi Tsuyoshi Shiga Tsugutoshi Suzuki Yukio Sekiguchi Kyoko Soejima Masahiko Takagi Masaomi Chinushi Nobuhiro Nishi Takashi Noda Hitoshi Hachiya Masataka Mitsuno Takeshi Mitsuhashi Yasushi Miyauchi Aya Miyazaki Tomoshige Morimoto Hiro Yamasaki Yoshifusa Aizawa Tohru Ohe Takeshi Kimura Kazuo Tanemoto Hiroyuki Tsutsui Hideo Mitamura on behalf of the JCS/JHRS Joint Working Group

出版者

The Japanese Circulation Society

雑誌

Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)

巻号頁・発行日

pp.CJ-20-0637, (Released:2021-06-01)

参考文献数

1350

被引用文献数

74

著者

Tomoyuki Kabutoya Takeshi Mitsuhashi Akihiko Shimizu Takashi Nitta Hideo Mitamura Takashi Kurita Haruhiko Abe Yuji Nakazato Naokata Sumitomo Kazushige Kadota Kazuo Kimura Ken Okumura

出版者

The Japanese Circulation Society

雑誌

Circulation Reports (ISSN:24340790)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.3, no.2, pp.69-76, 2021-02-10 (Released:2021-02-10)

参考文献数

25

被引用文献数

1

---

Background:There has been no large multicenter clinical trial on the prognosis of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of the present study was to compare differences in the prognoses of Japanese patients with CAD between primary and secondary prevention, and to identify potential predictors of prognosis.Methods and Results:We investigated 392 CAD patients (median age 69 years, 90% male) treated with ICD/CRT-D enrolled in the Japan Implantable Devices in CAD (JID-CAD) Registry. The primary endpoint was all-cause death, and the secondary endpoint was appropriate ICD therapies. Endpoints were assessed by dividing patients into primary prevention (n=165) and secondary prevention (n=227) groups. The mean (±SD) follow-up period was 2.1±0.9 years. The primary endpoint was similar in the 2 groups (P=0.350).Conclusions:The mortality rate in Japanese patients with CAD who underwent ICD/CRT-D implantation as primary prevention was not lower than that of patients who underwent ICD/CRT-D implantation as secondary prevention, despite the lower cardiac function in the patients undergoing ICD/CRT-D implantation as primary prevention.

著者

Takeshi Wada Mihoko Hagiwara-Nagasawa Ryuichi Kambayashi Ai Goto Koki Chiba Yoshio Nunoi Hiroko Izumi-Nakaseko Tadashi Koga Akio Matsumoto Yuji Nakazato Keith G. Lurie Atsushi Sugiyama

出版者

The Japanese Circulation Society

雑誌

Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.85, no.10, pp.1885-1891, 2021-09-24 (Released:2021-09-24)

参考文献数

29

---

Background:Effects of rapid electrical defibrillation and β-blockade on coronary ischemia/reperfusion-induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remain unknown.Methods and Results:After induction of VF by 30 min of ischemia followed by reperfusion, animals were treated with defibrillation alone (Group A, n=13), 2 min of open-chest cardiac massage followed by defibrillation (Group B, n=11), or the same therapy to Group B with propranolol (1 mg/kg, i.v.) treatment before ischemia/reperfusion (Group C, n=11). If return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was not attained, each therapy was repeated ≤3 times (Set-1). When ROSC was not obtained within Set-1, cardiac massage was applied to all animals followed by defibrillation, which was repeated ≤3 times (Set-2). ROSC after Set-1 was 8% in Group A, 82% in Group B and 82% in Group C, whereas that after Set-2 was 62% in Group A, 100% in Group B and 82% in Group C. Each animal with ROSC in Groups A (n=8) and B (n=11) showed sinus rhythm, whereas those in Group C (n=9) had sinus rhythm (n=5), atrial fibrillation (n=1), accelerated idioventricular rhythm (n=2) and atrioventricular block (n=1). Post ROSC heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly lower in Group C.Conclusions:Cardiac massage increased the likelihood of ROSC vs. rapid defibrillation, but β-blocker pretreatment may worsen hemodynamics and electrical stability after ROSC.