著者
大屋 雄裕
出版者
情報法制学会
雑誌
情報法制研究 (ISSN:24330264)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.6, pp.3-10, 2019 (Released:2019-11-20)
参考文献数
6
被引用文献数
1

The current challenge for evidence-based policy making (EBPM) held in the Japanese government lacks clear definition and scope of application in itself. By reconsidering the practice of evidence-based medicine (EBM) as a source of EBPM, and comparing between the two ideas, the author indicates that EBPM shall not correspond to clinical practice on each individual patient, but to the research process in EBM, as to design and practice clinical trials, evaluate them to establish treatment guidelines which shall be respected prima facie in the medical practices. From this viewpoint, the author tried to lead some lesson against the Japanese EBPM practice on its limits and standards in evaluation, as to be unassertive in making policy to have wide and unpredictable influence over human rights, to incorporate cancellation conditions on policies to realize suppression effects, and to respect comparative legal studies.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (2 users, 6 posts, 0 favorites)

“政策と実践:EBPM の限界と可能性” 慶應義塾大学法学部教授 大屋雄裕 2019 https://t.co/AgzhAjOHzc #経論 #経論統計
政策と実践: EBPM の限界と可能性 - https://t.co/3bn3MvsnBD #ScholarAlerts
政策と実践: EBPM の限界と可能性 - https://t.co/3bn3MvsnBD #ScholarAlerts
政策と実践: EBPM の限界と可能性 - https://t.co/3bn3MvsnBD #ScholarAlerts
政策と実践: EBPM の限界と可能性 - https://t.co/3bn3MvsnBD #ScholarAlerts
政策と実践: EBPM の限界と可能性 - https://t.co/3bn3MvsnBD #ScholarAlerts

収集済み URL リスト