著者
Hajime Saeki Miho Kuramoto Yoshinori Iida Kaori Yasumura Yoh Arita Nobuyuki Ogasawara
出版者
The Japanese Circulation Society
雑誌
Circulation Reports (ISSN:24340790)
巻号頁・発行日
pp.CR-23-0024, (Released:2023-03-31)
参考文献数
28

Background: In outpatient center-based cardiac rehabilitation (O-CBCR), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) based on the anaerobic threshold (AT) determined by cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing is recommended. However, it is unclear whether differences in exercise intensity within the MICT domain affect peak oxygen uptake (%peakV̇O2).Methods and Results: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent O-CBCR at Japan Community Healthcare Organization Osaka Hospital. Those treated with the constant-load method were designated as Group A (n=38), whereas those treated with the variable-load method were designated as Group B (n=48). Although the change in exercise intensity was significantly greater in Group B by approximately 4.5 W, the change in %peakV̇O2was not significantly different between groups. Group A had a significantly longer exercise time than Group B (by approximately 4–5 min). No deaths or hospitalizations occurred in either group. The percentage of episodes with exercise cessation was similar between the 2 groups, but the percentage of episodes with load reduction was significantly higher in Group B, mostly because of the increased heart rate.Conclusions: In supervised MICT based on AT, the variable-load method increased exercise intensity more than the constant-load method without severe complications, but did not improve %peakV̇O2.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (6 users, 13 posts, 26 favorites)

HIITを考慮しない通院心リハ患者の中等度持続運動において、変動負荷法は一定負荷法より重篤な合併症なく運動強度を高められたが、最高酸素摂取量の改善には至らなかった。 By 佐伯 一 https://t.co/sWTGTnUbO2 #circ_rep #CardioTwitter https://t.co/tZjvKugSuY
In MICT for CBCR out-patients not considering HIIT, the variable load method increased exercise intensity more than the constant load method without severe complications but did not improve peakVO2. By Saeki H https://t.co/sWTGTnUJDA #circ_rep #CardioTwitter https://t.co/GAFxtfm54d
HIITを考慮しない通院心リハ患者の中等度持続運動において、変動負荷法は一定負荷法より重篤な合併症なく運動強度を高められたが、最高酸素摂取量の改善には至らなかった。 By 佐伯 一 https://t.co/sWTGTnUJDA #circ_rep #CardioTwitter https://t.co/mdBXQEV4MJ
In MICT for CBCR out-patients not considering HIIT, the variable load method increased exercise intensity more than the constant load method without severe complications but did not improve peakVO2. By Saeki H https://t.co/sWTGTnUJDA #circ_rep #CardioTwitter https://t.co/VJAwJtnfMk

収集済み URL リスト