著者
松井 亮太
出版者
日本経営倫理学会
雑誌
日本経営倫理学会誌 (ISSN:13436627)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.26, pp.117-133, 2019-02-28 (Released:2019-05-27)

This paper conducted a comparative analysis about the falsification scandal uncovered at the nuclear department of the Tokyo Electric Power Company(TEPCO)in the 2000s and the insufficient tsunami risk assumption prior to the Fukushima nuclear accident which occurred in 2011 from a behavioral ethics standpoint. For the information source, I used the external lawyer investigation reports of the falsification scandal and the official investigation reports of the Fukushima nuclear accident. This paper also used the testimonies of the government investigation committee on the Fukushima nuclear accident which were publicly disclosed in 2014. As a result of the analysis, the common factors for the falsification scandal and the insufficient tsunami risk assumption were egocentric bias, loss framing, and moral licensing. In order to prevent unethical behavior and risk neglect, I made two recommendations based on the previous researches of behavioral ethics.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (3 users, 3 posts, 2 favorites)

https://t.co/TD15gfEFLr 東電津波の想定高さ改ざんとググったらこんなのでてきた
東京電力のトラブル隠し事件と2006年以降の津波想定の比較分析https://t.co/J2bcLHdAYO 「東電原子力部門のトラブル隠し」の一覧がありますが、普通に1970年代から不正やトラブル隠しを続けてますね。福島第一原発事故が起きたのも千年に一度の偶然や不運のせいではなく、むしろ必然っぽい。
@6w15jUw515PGlEI @MIRA0230 想定できたけど、対策をしようとしていなかったようですが。 記録は以下。 https://t.co/zEQQ9H1FPO

収集済み URL リスト