著者
宮田 裕章 大久保 豪 吉江 悟 甲斐 一郎
出版者
一般社団法人日本衛生学会
雑誌
日本衛生学雑誌 (ISSN:00215082)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.66, no.1, pp.83-94, 2011 (Released:2011-02-25)
参考文献数
69
被引用文献数
1 1

Debate about the relationship between quantitative and qualitative paradigms is often muddled and confusing and the clutter of terms and arguments has resulted in the concepts becoming obscure and unrecognizable. In this study we conducted content analysis regarding evaluation methods of qualitative healthcare research. We extracted descriptions on four types of evaluation paradigm (validity/credibility, reliability/credibility, objectivity/confirmability, and generalizability/transferability), and classified them into subcategories. In quantitative research, there has been many evaluation methods based on qualitative paradigms, and vice versa. Thus, it might not be useful to consider evaluation methods of qualitative paradigm are isolated from those of quantitative methods. Choosing practical evaluation methods based on the situation and prior conditions of each study is an important approach for researchers.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (2 users, 2 posts, 3 favorites)

木曜日の研究会にむけて読み直し。第二著者でしたが、この論文はかなり勉強になったのを思い出す。いろいろ見つけてアナハイの気持ちにもなるけれど。 https://t.co/pf1FNKcXsY

収集済み URL リスト