著者
森本 和滋 川崎 聡子 吉田 易範
出版者
日本薬史学会
雑誌
薬史学雑誌 (ISSN:02852314)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.50, no.1, pp.64-77, 2015 (Released:2020-12-03)

For 20 years, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW, formerly Ministry of Health and Welfare (MHW)) has been trying to increase transparency of the review process for approving reports in order to promote the rational use of newly approved drugs and medical devices. The first Summary Basis of Approval (SBA) was published by MHW in 1994. In 1999, evaluation reports were prepared by MHW and the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Evaluation Center to make them available to the public. In 2005, a notice from the Chief Executive of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) made procedures for public release of information on reviewing applications for new drugs. In 2006, 90 review reports of newly approved drugs and eight medical devices were revealed on PMDA websites. The dissemination of information by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and that of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) were studied and compared with that of the MHLW and PMDA. While common technical documents (CTD) for new drugs and summary technical documents (STED) for new medical devices have been released by PMDA, such documents are not released by the FDA and EMA. The European Public Assessment Report (EAPR) summary for the public is an interesting questionnaire approach that uses the What, How and Why format. Finally, future proposals for the next decade are also outlined. PMID: 26427100 [Indexed for MEDLINE]

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (9 users, 9 posts, 36 favorites)

@tokkyoteki https://t.co/RnsHNcAsO2 ↑の論文(2015)の72頁には、FDAにおいて製品処方は営業秘密または機密商品情報として扱われると記載されています。
主要評価項目がしょぼいと、当然、査読で切られる可能性が高い。研究者としてはそれじゃ困るのだが、PMDAを突破するためにはアクセプトは必須ではない。ただ、PMDAの審査も昔のそれとは違う。やはり情報公開は大事。 https://t.co/xEaNxFJ6I3

収集済み URL リスト