著者
増田 真也 坂上 貴之 森井 真広
出版者
公益社団法人 日本心理学会
雑誌
心理学研究 (ISSN:00215236)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.90, no.5, pp.463-472, 2019 (Released:2019-12-25)
参考文献数
40

Certain participants are insincere when responding to questionnaires. Two current approaches for detecting unmotivated or dishonest respondents, the instructional manipulation check (IMC), and the seriousness check, were examined. We also attempted to improve the quality of survey responses by asking respondents to take an oath that they would be serious before they started answering the questionnaire (TO). The respondents in two Web surveys were randomly assigned to one of four versions of the questionnaire. The main results indicated that (a) response quality tended to improve when respondents who did not follow instructions were excluded from the sample; and (b) respondents that who took an oath to answer seriously chose fewer “don’t know” options, straight line responses, and midpoint responses than the control group, suggesting that respondents behaved consistently with their initial commitment. The results indicate that although IMC is superior for improving data quality, techniques for deterring less serious responses including TO were desirable in that they did not reduce the sample size.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (3 users, 3 posts, 4 favorites)

【論文】増田他(2019) 心理学研究/IMC、SCに加え、TO(冒頭宣誓)を用いて、調査回答の質を向上させる方法を比較した研究。不良回答者の検出においてIMCはSCより優れていた。不良回答の防止としてTOは一定の効果が示唆され、… https://t.co/VvGyobvEDr
めも https://t.co/OEnzjNeaIR https://t.co/vc8qNaS6Yl https://t.co/jqKvJ9PSNw https://t.co/9r4jJawN1e

収集済み URL リスト