著者
増田 真也 坂上 貴之 森井 真広
出版者
公益社団法人 日本心理学会
雑誌
心理学研究 (ISSN:00215236)
巻号頁・発行日
pp.90.18042, (Released:2019-09-20)
参考文献数
40
被引用文献数
2

Certain participants are insincere when responding to questionnaires. Two current approaches for detecting unmotivated or dishonest respondents, the instructional manipulation check (IMC), and the seriousness check, were examined. We also attempted to improve the quality of survey responses by asking respondents to take an oath that they would be serious before they started answering the questionnaire (TO). The respondents in two Web surveys were randomly assigned to one of four versions of the questionnaire. The main results indicated that (a) response quality tended to improve when respondents who did not follow instructions were excluded from the sample; and (b) respondents that who took an oath to answer seriously chose fewer “don’t know” options, straight line responses, and midpoint responses than the control group, suggesting that respondents behaved consistently with their initial commitment. The results indicate that although IMC is superior for improving data quality, techniques for deterring less serious responses including TO were desirable in that they did not reduce the sample size.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

はてなブックマーク (1 users, 1 posts)

Twitter (12 users, 12 posts, 12 favorites)

調査回答の質の向上のための方法の比較 心理学研究https://t.co/KZiQfvhGtc
OECDの幸福度調査ほか、日本人があまり高い順位にいない理由。 そのひとつが、真ん中ばっかり選んだりして、真面目に回答しないせい、なんて言われているのは面白いですね。 https://t.co/cTl3fSe4d5
IMCの別バージョンが載ってたから次から使おうかな… https://t.co/6Yzsghbgqz
J-STAGE Articles - 調査回答の質の向上のための方法の比較 https://t.co/T60slCuJdD 最初に宣言させるライフハック(が有効な問いもそうでない問いもあるらしいが)
調査回答の質の向上のための方法の比較 - https://t.co/ffSefVH99a #ScholarAlerts
【「心理学研究」新着早期公開論文(9月分)】調査回答の質の向上のための方法の比較https://t.co/BIZtJO7o76 日本語アブストラクト:https://t.co/kFGbE0MmZ6

収集済み URL リスト