著者
関澤 純
出版者
一般社団法人 日本リスク学会
雑誌
リスク学研究 (ISSN:24358428)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.32, no.1, pp.31-42, 2022-09-15 (Released:2022-09-23)
参考文献数
73

Recently attention is focused on the disposal of treated radioactively polluted water to the ocean from collapsed Fukushima nuclear power plant. Japanese government claiming safety of the treated water, is trying to mitigate “reputational damages” of Fukushima fishery people. However, there are real risks with the damaged plant, such as lowering of water level in the reactor vessel by a big earthquake early 2021. After the plant accident, Japanese government forced the Fukushima residents to leave their home towns by setting difficult-to-return zones, etc. Besides, Japanese government set new strict rules on radioactive pollution of foods. These regulations have caused difficult situations in living conditions of Fukushima people through long time evacuation and superfluous testing of many foods etc. Consequently, based on these critical governmental regulations, not only “reputational damages”, but real serious damages, are brought about to many people. Rules must be based on basic safe sciences and be reasonable in minimizing possible risks to people and the society. This paper is dedicated to the Ukrainian who suffer from unjustifiable war crime.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (4 users, 5 posts, 8 favorites)

「「風評被害」という言葉の罪と罰  ―「トリチウム水」強制放出をどう考える?―」 https://t.co/NhYOB06WL9 https://t.co/XUVTDkxL83
@akwillakwill @kishida230 はしきりに「風評被害」を理由になんか言ったとかいうが、 「そもそも汚染水がなぜ発生し,なくすことができないのか…現実に存在する様々のリスク要因への適切かつ十分な対策を後回しにして「風評被害」への対応として表面的な対処をすべき課題ではない」( https://t.co/TB5wuwKSP7 )

収集済み URL リスト