著者
伊勢田 哲治
出版者
日本科学哲学会
雑誌
科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.28, pp.61-78, 1995-11-15 (Released:2009-05-29)
参考文献数
15

There have been interesting debates between Hilary Putnam and his critics on his argument against metaphysical realism. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the nature of the debates and to defend Putnam's position in several important points. There are two types of criticism, one is to defend the correspondence theory of truth, and the other is to defend metaphysical realism without the correspondence theory of truth. Putnam seems to be able to answer these criticism effectively. Of course this isn't exhaustive survey, but I think this limited survey is enough to indicate the remaining problems.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

はてなブックマーク (1 users, 1 posts)

Twitter (3 users, 3 posts, 2 favorites)

“形而上学的実在論は論駁されたか?” https://t.co/26OHAMlrIg
それと今日は伊勢田(1995)「形而上学的実在論は論駁されたか」(『科学哲学』28、61-78頁、https://t.co/6pqvazJRCR )を読む。パトナムのモデル論的議論についてわりと擁護する方向の内容。日本語文献なのに見落としていた...。

収集済み URL リスト