著者
野家 啓一
出版者
日本科学哲学会
雑誌
科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.29, pp.45-60, 1996-11-15 (Released:2009-05-29)

Prof. Kobayashi criticized the Duhem-Quine thesis from an original point of view in his recent book Philosophy of Sience. His point is that there is "a difference of degree concerning theoreticity" which means the vulnerability to a theoretical revision in the whole system of physical theory. But, in my view, scientists cannot uniquely determine which is the object of revision between main hypotheses and auxiliary hypotheses. While in the "normal science" period auxiliary hypotheses are revised by falsificational experiments, only in the "scientific revolution" period main hypotheses are falsified. Therefore the so-called crucial experiment is no other than an honorary title which is awarded by historical consideration in a later period.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (2 users, 3 posts, 1 favorites)

デュエム=クワイン・テーゼは野家先生のこれ( https://t.co/SiLQvrCOG8 )もなかなかいいですよね
デュエム=クワインテーゼを巡って https://t.co/SiLQvrldhy

収集済み URL リスト