著者
戸田山 和久
出版者
日本科学哲学会
雑誌
科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.36, no.2, pp.1-19, 2003-12-30 (Released:2009-05-29)
参考文献数
17
被引用文献数
1

There seems to be a consensus among philosophers who are interested in Russell's early philosophy of mathematics. They hold that we can best understand the process of its development on the assumption that Russell kept trying to reconcile a type-theoretical solution to the paradoxes with the doctrine of univocality of being. This assumption have worked well in so far as to reconstruct the history of Russell's endearvor from Principles of Mathematics (1903) through the invention of substitutional theory (1905-7). Taking Principia Mathematica (1910) into consideration, however, this assumption seems to fail. There are many questions left unanswerable concerning the relation between PM and his former position. In this paper, I will survey some of the recent findings in the Russell Archives and Gregory Landini's works based on these findings, and clarify the relevance they could have to the "unanswered questions" mentioned above.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Yahoo!知恵袋 (1 users, 1 posts)

数学のどこを探しても「絶対に正しい」という言葉は 出てこないと思います。 完全に数学を信頼しきっている人は、イスラームの神学者、 アブー・ハーミド・ムハンマド・ブン・ムハンマド・ガザーリー くらいまで遡らないといけないと思います。 「もし形而上学が数学や論理学の如く完全な論理的証明にもとづくもので あるならば、形而上学者の間に意見の衝突は起こらなかったであろう」 井筒俊彦著 ...

はてなブックマーク (1 users, 1 posts)

収集済み URL リスト