著者
舘石 和香葉 小野田 竜一 高橋 伸幸
出版者
日本社会心理学会
雑誌
社会心理学研究 (ISSN:09161503)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.36, no.3, pp.96-103, 2021-03-31 (Released:2021-03-31)
参考文献数
14

Whether engaging in costly punishment can be an adaptive strategy by enhancing the punisher’s reputation is a crucial question in efforts to explain punishment behaviors. However, empirical findings on this question are mixed. Based on Raihani and Bshary’s (2015) argument, the current study empirically examined the possibility that how a punisher’s motives are estimated affects the reputation of the punisher. We employed a vignette experiment which was designed to make it simple for respondents to estimate each punisher’s motives. Each vignette described a defector in a social dilemma and a punisher who punished the defector using one of four types of punishment. Respondents then estimated the punisher’s motives and evaluated their impressions. The results revealed that the estimated motives depended on the type of punishment which the punishers utilized and that evaluations of punishers varied across the four types of punishment. Thus, the context in which punishment is employed may affect a punisher’s reputation, and this in turn might ultimately determine whether engaging in punishment is adaptive.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (4 users, 4 posts, 5 favorites)

罰行使の動機推定が評判に与える影響:複数の罰選択肢を用いた検討 北大の舘石さんの論文! https://t.co/TIDN4rYy1o

収集済み URL リスト