著者
Junna Oba Hiroaki Taniguchi Masae Sato Reika Takamatsu Satoru Morikawa Taneaki Nakagawa Hiromasa Takaishi Hideyuki Saya Koichi Matsuo Hiroshi Nishihara
出版者
The Keio Journal of Medicine
雑誌
The Keio Journal of Medicine (ISSN:00229717)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.70, no.2, pp.35-43, 2021 (Released:2021-06-25)
参考文献数
52
被引用文献数
2 21

The year 2020 will be remembered for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which continues to affect the whole world. Early and accurate identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is fundamental to combat the disease. Among the current diagnostic tests, real-time reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is the most reliable and frequently used method. Herein, we discuss the interpretation of RT-qPCR results relative to viral infectivity. Although nasopharyngeal swab samples are often used for RT-qPCR testing, they require collection by trained medical staff. Saliva samples are emerging as an inexpensive and efficient alternative for large-scale screening. Pooled-sample testing of saliva has been applied for mass screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Current policies recommend isolating people with borderline cycle threshold (Ct) values (35<Ct <40), despite these Ct values indicating minimal infection risk. We propose the new concept of a “social cut-off” Ct value and risk stratification based on the correlation of Ct with infectivity. We also describe the experience of RT-qPCR screening of saliva samples at our institution. It is important to implement a scientific approach to minimize viral transmission while allowing economic and social activities to continue.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (34 users, 35 posts, 74 favorites)

その報告を監修された慶應義塾大学 西原教授らの発表論文 https://t.co/oA9B8xTqlP
こう言う詳しくない人の意見がノイズになる 偽陽性、偽陰性の文言も違えばCT値の理解も違う 政府の初期段階での情報発信ミスは否めない https://t.co/WIT0wh5h8G https://t.co/uNg7tpLePU https://t.co/qdEicS1s0p https://t.co/SDDgOtXfdr
@a2cka2ck @cafe_andoromeda @0Eyrxu29Vzgo33L @c9___9c @ryuseiheart 大間違いですよ。 ソースの論文では国やメーカーや検査手法によっては多少異なるがと前置きしたうえで、 Ct値が34未満で陽性判定。 34~37は再検査推奨。 ペットボトル1本分で例えた37超は陰性判断ですよ。 「らしい」と言ってる情報は鵜呑みにしない方がいいですね。 https://t.co/jDkoZYRvkL
コロナ検査PCR 日本のCT値は、本来非陽性 https://t.co/Vok8Jln12K

収集済み URL リスト