著者
田村 哲樹
出版者
JAPANESE POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION
雑誌
年報政治学 (ISSN:05494192)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.57, no.2, pp.11-35,263, 2006 (Released:2010-04-30)
参考文献数
72

In this article, focusing upon the recent development in deliberative democracy studies, I clarify the current state of relationship between normative theory and empirical research and consider its future.Deliberative democracy had been discussed by normative theorists. But in recent years, some important empirical studies have emerged. There are two ways of inference among those studies: one is descriptive inference, and the other is causal inference.Some normative theorists also try to take some empirical moments into account. We can find two approaches. One is to suggest institutional design of deliberative democracy. The other is to use the empirical knowledge in order to develop normative theory.Some scholars insist that both normative and empirical can not be separated. But it is hard to conceive the dissolution of normative/empirical distinction. One of the most important differences between the two is the way to understand “reality”, while this does not mean that there is no point of intersection between the two.My conclusion is that: there are some points of intersection between normative theory and empirical analysis. Trying to engage in issue-oriented research, we may be able to close the gap between normative and empirical.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (4 users, 4 posts, 1 favorites)

田村哲樹「規範理論と経験的研究との対話可能性」 https://t.co/LFJiKtYm82
https://t.co/24lXqviXfi https://t.co/oCF6w7OoVH https://t.co/YF5pmdGg13 この辺がまずヒントになりそう・・・ 規範と記述は意識したほうがいいし・・・特に千葉大の公共的な人たちは注意してほしい・・・
こういう表現なら分かります。 「社会的実在との接触を失う危険につねにさらされている規範主義的立場と, いっさい の規範的側面を消去してしまう客観主義的立場との分裂」 "規範理論と経験的研究との対話可能性" https://t.co/si0xpkKj3B
J-STAGE Articles - 規範理論と経験的研究との対話可能性 https://t.co/q7nTdoSTvF

収集済み URL リスト