著者
近藤 良享
出版者
日本スポーツとジェンダー学会
雑誌
スポーツとジェンダー研究 (ISSN:13482157)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.14, pp.121-133, 2016 (Released:2017-04-25)
参考文献数
17

The topic of equality and fairness in sports rules can be debated from a variety of perspectives. Accordingly, this research seeks to analyze the various theories regarding separate events for men and women discussed by sports philosophers and sports ethicists and proposes the use of a handicapping method. Based on the analysis of theories, it can be concluded that separate events for men and women is currently accepted by sports philosophers and sports ethicists. If a system that could provide both equality of opportunity and equality of results in sports were created, competitors who put in the greatest effort or who were lucky would likely win. The method of achieving this is handicapping or sports standardization. Paul Weiss, a sports philosopher, explains the effects as follows: “Handicaps are imposed so that even if weight, sex, or experience are different, a better competitor can compete equally against a weaker competitor. This imposes a restriction on the better competitor so that he/she is at the same level as others while allowing better conditions or a higher score for the weaker competitor, providing an opportunity to beat a superior athlete on equal terms.” Weiss indicates that the intention of sports standardization is not to encourage participation in sports by more people by making it possible for anyone to win, but rather to provide opportunities for each individual to learn what they can achieve by overcoming limitations such as weight, sex, and experience. Handicapped sports recognize differences in birth, sex, background, competitive ability, values, and so on without eliminating the reasons for the individual differences and create a place for competition. When individuals recognize one another, society as a whole become stronger. The elimination of gender from sports that use handicaps has particular significance in disseminating the strengthening of society itself from the world of sports.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

はてなブックマーク (2 users, 2 posts)

Twitter (18 users, 21 posts, 9 favorites)

ジェンダーレス徒競走がなんだかんだのやつ。細かいところは無視するとして、競馬で牝馬や女性騎手が斤量減となる制度は他の競技でも使えそうと思って調べたが、過去にはオリンピック陸上競技で男女混合でハンデが設けられてた例もあるのね。 https://t.co/r0gDpDNdmw
@wrxstibeauty こんにちは。 では、これを見てどう思いますか? https://t.co/HA7Snfjdni
"第3 の男女別競技を実施する理由は,男女一緒にすると女子にやる気がなくなること (discourage) への懸念である." https://t.co/4l9J3lOykX
この記事(論文?)が参考になりました スポーツ・ルールにおける平等と公正 男女別競技からハンディキャップ競技へ https://t.co/Jpd1U59nPe
関連:スポーツ・ルールにおける平等と公正 -男女別競技からハンディキャップ競技へ- https://t.co/oHcDo4FyWg / 他200件のコメント https://t.co/vHTAYu8dez “なぜ、女子サッカー選手は「"女子"サッカーの魅力」を考えなければいけないのか。|下山田志帆/Shimo Shiho|note” https://t.co/S8aS966616
これを読んで思ったのは、そもそも女性アスリートや女子競技の市民権や参加がここ10数年でやっと認められてきたということをもう一度確認しないとなということかな。https://t.co/GyxtZkw9xK
スポーツ・ルールにおける平等と公正 男女別競技からハンディキャップ競技へ https://t.co/6JNkvJWWxN

収集済み URL リスト