著者
菊池 泰平
出版者
京都大学東南アジア地域研究研究所
雑誌
東南アジア研究 (ISSN:05638682)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.59, no.2, pp.290-320, 2022-01-31 (Released:2022-01-31)
参考文献数
43

This paper examines the process of molding the official history of the Panglong Conference, which was held in February 1947 in Myanmar. According to the history shaped by the Burma Socialist Programme Party (BSPP), the Burmese nationalist leader Aung San and minorities’ representatives agreed to establish the union state. Hence, “Panglong” is interpreted as the symbol of national solidarity today. While the BSPP used the above history to appeal its legitimacy, it viewed the military as a guardian of the multiracial country. The “national solidarity” image of the Panglong Conference was reinforced under restricted freedom of speech. During the critical moment of the 8888 uprising, the Committee for the Compilation of Authentic Facts of Myanmar History again edited the history of the Panglong Conference. To make the history more inclusive and to base it on the “national solidarity” image, the committee used the narratives of various people who joined in the event. Htun Myint was one of the activists who founded the Shan State Freedom League, and he referred to the Panglong Conference as a means of requesting minorities’ rights after Independence. However, the committee hid Htun Myint’s political views and accepted only those parts of his narrative that supported their position.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (2 users, 2 posts, 2 favorites)

1946、47年の辺境地域の少数民族の処遇について協議したパンロン会議。 「ビルマ族に対する一部少数民族代表たちの抱く誤解は解消困難だと判断したアウンサンが、ヤンゴンへの航空機を手配した」 とあるな

収集済み URL リスト