著者
井芹 聖文
出版者
京都大学大学院教育学研究科
雑誌
京都大学大学院教育学研究科紀要 (ISSN:13452142)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.58, pp.261-273, 2012-04-27

This study was performed to examine the way people suffering from illnesses ask for the name of their condition, by analyzing self-diagnoses and one case. When people concerned give a name to their illness, it leads either to relief of their pain, presents a new opportunity for coping with it, or causes additional distress, causing them to stop thinking and lose sight of themselves. In this case, the client diagnosed his illness as pervasive developmental disorder because he tried to explain his feeling of absence to himself and find his identity with the name. Moreover, through the name, he appealed to the therapist for approval. The client's confession of self-diagnosis to the therapist is an expression of the difficulties of living, considered as a negative self-introduction. It is often difficult to accept an illness and suffering even if it is given a name. Above all, it is important that a therapist has a receptive attitude toward a client's feeling of sorrow in the self-diagnosis.
著者
井芹 聖文
出版者
京都大学大学院教育学研究科
雑誌
京都大学大学院教育学研究科紀要 (ISSN:13452142)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.59, pp.429-441, 2013-03-28

This study examined the naming mechanism in clinical psychology. Through interpretation of treatment in shamanism and Onmyoudou, or "Genesis" and "the oldest of chronicles of Japan," the following ideas in basic naming mechanism were elaborated; a) a structure that an subject names an object, b) a cutting function, which has either a productive and creative aspect or a violent and destructive aspect, c) characteristic property in time and space. These points were reconsidered from the viewpoint of clinical psychology, in which superiority of the ego is discussed. Moreover. it is important that the subject commits the object as much as possible. Considering the relationship between the client and a therapist, a method to examine the naming mechanism in clinical psychology is enabled as follows; when the name is born in the relationship with the main subject and the object, how does another subject commit and affect this process? In comparison with the conventional naming mechanism apt to be thought as one psychology models, this model provides a methodology to consider the naming mechanism in two psychology models.