著者
門野 泉
出版者
英米文化学会
雑誌
英米文化 (ISSN:09173536)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.33, pp.27-42, 2003

Many contemporary British directors seem to realize that modern, realistic, psychological analysis and interpretations are not enough to revive Shakespeare's dramatic dynamism on stage. Some directors draw upon Japanese traditional classic drama such as Noh and Kabuki, which have inherited dramatic traditions and conventions of medieval, early modern dramas. Having found shared points of commonality between Shakespeare and Kabuki, some directors have successfully adopted the dramatic techniques and staging of Kabuki in Shakespeare's plays. The transfer of Kabuki theatrical devices and acting methods has breathed new life into Shakespeare in recent productions by the Royal Shakespeare Company and Almeida Theatre. Although Shakespeare's Globe is able to exploit its unique building form to stage Elizabethan and Jacobean plays, it is very difficult to obtain details of the original Elizabethan stage practices and performances. The company has shown considerable interest in the traditional drama of Kabuki, because both forms of theatre seem to share the dynamic energy of early modern drama. Kabuki has many hints and suggestions to offer those who are eager to revive the Elizabethan stage in the contemporary Globe. The Shakespeare Globe Company have staged a revival production of Twelfth Night in which they made every possible effort to revive the dramatic traditions and methods that characterized the original staging at Middle Temple Hall in 1 602. One of these was the use of an all-male cast, which was also inspired by Kabuki onnagata, or female role specialists. This paper will consider how these English onnagata played Olivia and Viola, and their significance in the revival production of Twelfth Night at Middle Temple Hall. Mark Rylance, who played the role of Olivia, expressed femininity in a stylistic way rather than just copying womanly manners. The countess appeared very feminine not merely because "she" looked ladylike, but because the actor personified a kind of feminine essence, which is what onnagata try to achieve in Kabuki. Rylance was very successful in depicting the comical element in the proud Olivia, in vivid contrast to the patient Viola. Eddie Redmayne's Viola was unique in the sense that he was able to represent both male and female characteristics in a very natural manner, which would be almost impossible for any actress to achieve. As an "onnagata", he appeared to possess both sexes on stage, which made his Viola both unique and charming. In the recognition of the twins, Viola and Sebastian, in the final scene, the two male actors wearing the same costume looked so alike that Shakespeare's intended use of the twins seemed to be fully realized in this production. In one beautiful moment, all the confulsion was completely resolved, leaving a deep impression on the audience. Twelfth Night featuring an all-male cast was not merely an old-fashioned, nostalgic revival but a well staged production that enabled us to rediscover what had been lost from the play for a long time. The production was a revelation of what Twelfth Night must have been like in Shakespeare's day.
著者
門野 泉
出版者
英米文化学会
雑誌
英米文化 (ISSN:09173536)
巻号頁・発行日
no.40, pp.111-127, 2010-03-31

Thomas Middleton's A Game at Chess provoked a scandal when it was first performed at the Globe Theatre in 1624. Due to the severe sarcasm it directed against Count Gondomar, former Spanish ambassador, and Catholic Spain, the play was banned by the Privy Council after 9 consecutive performances because it was considered that the King's Men had flouted the commandment that no contemporary Christian monarchs should be represented on stage. It seems certain that there were much more serious reasons why this play would have offended James I, who ordered an investigation into the offensive performances with the intent of making a severe example of the offenders. After strict interrogations, the Master of Revels and individual actors were found not guilty. After being given a stern warning, the King's Men were ordered to pay a light fine, and only Middleton was jailed in the Fleet prison. The decisions of the Privy Council appeared to be politically motivated and unfair. However, careful reading of the comedy reveals that the playwright portrayed James I as having innocent foolishness, lack of confidence, lacking both leadership and insight into human nature, and many other weaknesses as a king, in comparison with the Machiavellian Count Gondmar's superb political ability, sharp insight and brilliant tactics. There can be no doubt that the members of the Privy Council realized that Middleton's satire was focused not only on Spain but also on the King of England and his court. This would seem to explain why he received the heaviest sentence. Although this was an unfortunate outcome for him, when viewed from another angle, the punishment was a positive evaluation of his sharp satirical comedy, and therefore can be considered a "just reward" for his brilliant talent and sharp insight into human nature.