著者

土屋 宗一

出版者

国際基督教大学比較文化研究会

雑誌

ICU比較文化 = ICU comparative culture (ISSN:03895475)

巻号頁・発行日

no.53, pp.59-79, 2021-01

著者

土屋 宗一

出版者

国際基督教大学比較文化研究会

雑誌

ICU比較文化 = ICU comparative culture (ISSN:03895475)

巻号頁・発行日

no.50, pp.63-80, 2018-01

著者

謝 銀萍

出版者

国際基督教大学比較文化研究会

雑誌

ICU比較文化 = ICU comparative culture (ISSN:03895475)

巻号頁・発行日

no.53, pp.31-57, 2021-01

著者

菅谷 基

出版者

国際基督教大学比較文化研究会 / ICU Society for the Study of Comparative Culture

雑誌

ICU比較文化 = ICU Comparative Culture (ISSN:03895475)

巻号頁・発行日

no.48, pp.63-98, 2016-01-31

著者

田中 伸明

雑誌

ICU比較文化 = ICU Comparative Culture

巻号頁・発行日

no.52, pp.69-100, 2020-01-31

著者

田中 伸明

出版者

国際基督教大学比較文化研究会 / ICU Society for the Study of Comparative Culture

雑誌

ICU比較文化 = ICU Comparative Culture (ISSN:03895475)

巻号頁・発行日

no.51, pp.53-118, 2019-01-31

著者

田中 伸明

出版者

国際基督教大学比較文化研究会 / ICU Society for the Study of Comparative Culture

雑誌

ICU比較文化 = ICU Comparative Culture (ISSN:03895475)

巻号頁・発行日

no.50, pp.81-110, 2018-01-31

著者

ベニーニョ フランチェスコ 喜友名 朝輝 竹下 和亮

出版者

国際基督教大学比較文化研究会

雑誌

ICU比較文化 = ICU comparative culture (ISSN:03895475)

巻号頁・発行日

no.53, pp.203-233, 2021-01

著者

第3代シャフツベリ伯爵 菅谷 基

出版者

国際基督教大学比較文化研究会

雑誌

ICU比較文化 = ICU comparative culture (ISSN:03895475)

巻号頁・発行日

no.53, pp.167-201, 2021-01

著者

ヒラー ヨーハン・アダム 田中 伸明

出版者

国際基督教大学比較文化研究会

雑誌

ICU比較文化 = ICU comparative culture (ISSN:03895475)

巻号頁・発行日

no.53, pp.127-166, 2021-01

著者

小畑 敦嗣

出版者

国際基督教大学比較文化研究会

雑誌

ICU比較文化 = ICU comparative culture (ISSN:03895475)

巻号頁・発行日

no.53, pp.1-30, 2021-01

著者

青砥 吉隆

出版者

国際基督教大学比較文化研究会 / ICU Society for the Study of Comparative Culture

雑誌

ICU比較文化 = ICU Comparative Culture (ISSN:03895475)

巻号頁・発行日

no.46, pp.47-63, 2014-03-31

---

This study aims to highlight an aspect of the Apollo Program that has rarelybeen studied. The space program was a realistic answer to the very Americanquestion: “how should the United States commit to the rest of the world?”Through analyzing two speeches made by President Kennedy regarding sendingastronauts to the moon, the author tries to illustrate the untold purpose of thespace program and the way in which the president convinced Congress andAmerican people.On May 25, 1961, Kennedy made a speech titled “the Special Message tothe Congress on Urgent National Needs” in order to start up a space programthat aimed to send men to the moon and return them safely to Earth. Kennedydeclared the “Freedom Doctrine” in this speech. By claiming that Americanstrength and conviction imposed upon the nation the role of leader in freedom’scause, the president sought to persuade Congress to approve the program. Hewas firmly convinced that the Soviet supremacy in space, such as Sputnik-1 andthe first manned flight by Gagarin, had greatly weakened the United States inforeign affairs. America must have achieved a prominent victory in space in orderto win the battle on Earth between “Freedom and Tyranny.”In a speech at Rice University on September 12, 1962, Kennedy stated thatthe United States should have a leading role in science and technology, andemphasized that the nation must win the space race by being “first.” He believedthat science and technology, as well as Freedom, were aspects of Americannational identity. In addition, the president mentioned that it was difficult to keepspace peaceful unless the United States won the race against the Soviet Union.To be the first nation to land men on the moon meant not only preventing theRussians from extending their power in space, but also showing off their abilityto lead the world in every way.Freedom and scientific technologies, the national identity of the UnitedStates, were severely threatened in the early 1960s because of the overwhelmingsuperiority of the Soviet Union in space achievement. Under these very harshcircumstances, the United States regarded their rival as a formidable challenge tothe American raison d’être as the world’s most advanced country. By spending 24billion dollars and successfully conducting the space program, the United Statestried to restore their image as the world’s leader in freedom’s cause and scientifictechnologies. As Kennedy himself articulated, the Apollo Program was an “act offaith and vision.”

著者

MORRISON Lindsay R.

出版者

国際基督教大学比較文化研究会 / ICU Society for the Study of Comparative Culture

雑誌

ICU比較文化 = ICU Comparative Culture (ISSN:03895475)

巻号頁・発行日

no.46, pp.185-203, 2014-03-31

著者

小畑 敦嗣

出版者

国際基督教大学比較文化研究会

雑誌

ICU比較文化 = ICU comparative culture (ISSN:03895475)

巻号頁・発行日

no.52, pp.1-34, 2020-01

著者

山口 京一郎

出版者

国際基督教大学比較文化研究会 / ICU Society for the Study of Comparative Culture

雑誌

ICU比較文化 = ICU Comparative Culture (ISSN:03895475)

巻号頁・発行日

no.46, pp.23-46, 2014-03-31

---

Elder Philostratus’ Eikones contains a series of ekphrasis of paintingsconcerning the division of land by Poseidon: II.14 “Thessaly,” II.16 “Palaemon,”and the second island and the third-fourth islands in II.17 “Islands.” This articlediscusses the composition and links between these parts, concentrating onPoseidon and geographical change, along with their meaning.The formation of the vale of Tempe by Poseidon is described in II.14“Thessaly:” Poseidon is in a threatening posture while breaking mountains, andhis attitude to the emerging plain is welcoming. Also mentioned in “Palaemon”and the third-fourth islands, the story connects these three parts. The openingof the sacred depth of Isthmus of Corinth and its acceptance of Melicertes isdepicted in II.16 “Palaemon,” with Poseidon’s order to open the land and hissmile at Melicertes. The second island in “Islands” (II.17.3) does not containa story of geographical change, but the statue of Poseidon in the painting isdescribed as though it is sailing through the ground by breaking it. The thirdfourthislands (II.17.4) were formerly joined as one, but were broken apart intotwo, like Tempe. Though the description of the islands does not contain Poseidon,the preceding island and the mention of Tempe having earthquakes recalls itssource, Earth-opening Poseidon, or Earth-shaking Poseidon. At the same time,the way of illustrating Tempe here is differs from that in “Thessaly.” Thus, theillustration in the third-fourth islands becomes a supplementary explanation for“Thessaly.” These connections are supported by the verbal link with rJhvgnumi ‘tobreak, break asunder.’ The second island and the third-fourth islands also have aunity owing to its composition. These four parts of geographical stories allow usto read them in reference to each other.Viewing the series on Poseidon and the division of land, we find that theyshare a connection to each other, and the image of the rather gentle grace ofPoseidon or geographical change that sometimes shown long after its rupture. Inaddition, human activity could have participated in making the rupture appeargraceful. In the third-fourth islands, the divided islands look unified due to abridge, and wagons go over it, while ships sail under it.

著者

ヒラー ヨハン アダム 田中 伸明

出版者

国際基督教大学比較文化研究会

雑誌

ICU比較文化 = ICU comparative culture (ISSN:03895475)

巻号頁・発行日

no.50, pp.81-110, 2018-01