1/ Could Health Canada please explain why it ignores evidence such as this systematic review to claim that Wi-Fi poses no risk to human health? Adverse Effects of Wi-Fi Radiation on Male Reproductive System: A Systematic Review https://t.co/iCxdS9wiNZ @GovCanHealth

@KFLAPH @cityofkingston @InFrontenac @L @loyalist TY KFLAPH for this important radon campaign. Many people are becoming aware about another avoidable risk in your home: WiFi. Systematic review re male sexual health: https://t.co/iCxdS9wiNZ Also, in this review neuropsychiatric effects, DNA damage... https://t.co/ciIjmqcfJO

@rbrodeur We shouldn't ignore science because it is inconvenient. Knowledge is empowering allows us to make better decisions. Two separate systematic reviews tell us this radiation is bad for men's reproductive systems. https://t.co/pZuxzOcLFc and https://t.co/TgsC91Q3iL @Elliotatthewhig

More concerning than cancer, the massive increase in wireless technologies has implications to reproduction. We cannot ignore this threat. https://t.co/AidJ3kAq94 Zero pre-market safety testing has been done for 5G. 100% unacceptable. @MarkGerretsen @cityofkingston @KFLAPH

Show me the science! This is a new systematic review on male reproduction. Adverse Effects of Wi-Fi Radiation on Male Reproductive System: A Systematic Review https://t.co/EvjYv7R65i #fertility #infertility #reproductivehealth #MaleHealth #PublicHealth @KingstonMOH @KFLAPH