著者

高 賢来

出版者

北東アジア学会編集委員会

雑誌

北東アジア地域研究 (ISSN:1882692X)

巻号頁・発行日

no.16, pp.1-13, 2010

---

In the early 1950's, the roles of the Northeast Asian states, including quasi-states like Okinawa, were formed as American Cold War policy was tied to the policies of each local government. However, at the same time, arguments of resistance to these roles were also formed in each state. This paper deals with those arguments. Since each state played a different role in America's Cold War policy, there were significant differences in the characters of their respective arguments of resistance. Nonetheless, these arguments share a common background since they appeared when these states became embroiled in the Cold War, and intensified thereafter amid the changing international situation in the mid-1950's. From 1957 onwards, these arguments of resistance pressed for the need to reorganization the US's policy on Northeast Asia. This paper examines the processes by which each of these arguments of resistance was simultaneously formed and developed and the critical factors of these developments, by focusing on the the ideological changes of political leaders in each state. This paper treats Japan, Republic of Korea and Okinawa, because these states (and administrative distric) were inextricably tied to each other within US policy vis-a-vis Northeast Asia.