著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

大谷大学佛教学会

雑誌

佛教学セミナー = BUDDHIST SEMINAR (ISSN:02871556)

巻号頁・発行日

no.99, pp.23-51, 2014-06-30

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

日本印度学仏教学会

雑誌

印度學佛教學研究 (ISSN:00194344)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.61, no.1, pp.342-334, 2012-12-20

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

花園大学文学部

雑誌

花園大学文学部研究紀要 (ISSN:1342467X)

巻号頁・発行日

no.28, pp.111-148, 1996-03

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

教育調査研究所

雑誌

教育展望 (ISSN:09120254)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.67, no.10, pp.5-20, 2021-11

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

日本印度学仏教学会

雑誌

印度學佛教學研究 (ISSN:00194344)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.61, no.1, pp.342-334, 2012-12-20 (Released:2017-09-01)

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

宗教倫理学会

雑誌

宗教と倫理 = Religion and ethics

巻号頁・発行日

no.19, pp.3-13, 2019-12

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

青土社

雑誌

現代思想

巻号頁・発行日

vol.47, no.14, pp.154-162, 2019-11

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

浄土真宗本願寺派宗学院

雑誌

宗學院論集 = The journal of Jōdo-Sinshū studies (ISSN:02874571)

巻号頁・発行日

no.91, pp.251-280, 2019-03

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

日本印度学仏教学会

雑誌

印度學佛教學研究 (ISSN:00194344)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.67, no.2, pp.1025-1019, 2019-03

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

日本印度学仏教学会

雑誌

印度學佛教學研究 (ISSN:00194344)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.65, no.2, pp.809-802, 2017-03

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

日本印度学仏教学会

雑誌

印度學佛教學研究 (ISSN:00194344)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.65, no.2, pp.809-802, 2017

---

<p>It seems to be strange that two different Vinayas, the <i>Shisong lü </i>十誦律, Ten Recitation Vihana, and the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya, are extant but belong to the same sect, the Sarvāstivādins. The issue of how we should place them in the historical development of the Sarvāstivādins is particularly meaningful with respect to the investigation of the history of Buddhism, but no clear result has so far been found because of a lack of information; we have only some vague traditions.</p><p>In this article, the author presents information which clearly shows that the <i>Shisong lü</i> and the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya were related with the Kāśmīra-vaibhāṣikas and Sautrāntikas respectively.</p><p>A passage in the Vinaya is quoted in a dispute between the Sautrāntikas and Kāśmīra-vaibhāṣikas described in the <i>Karmanirdeśa </i>of the <i>Abhidharmakośabhāṣya</i>. The corresponding passage can be found in both the <i>Shisong lü</i> and the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya and, as a result of a detailed investigation, it turned out that the corresponding passage in the <i>Shisong lü</i> was modified for the purpose of reinforcement of the Kāśmīra-vaibhāṣikas' claim in the dispute appearing in the <i>Abhidharmakośabhāṣya</i>,<i> </i>and the corresponding passage in the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya (Chinese version) was modified to reinforece the claim of the Sautrāntikas.</p><p>From this fact, we can establish a close relationship between the <i>Shisong lü</i> and Kāśmīra-vaibhāṣikas, and the Mūlasarvāstivāda Vinaya and the Sautrāntikas.</p>

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

日本印度学仏教学会

雑誌

印度學佛教學研究 (ISSN:00194344)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.64, no.1, pp.348-341, 2015-12

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

日本印度学仏教学会

雑誌

印度學佛教學研究 (ISSN:00194344)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.64, no.1, pp.348-341, 2015

著者

佐々木 閑 鵜飼 秀徳

出版者

文藝春秋

雑誌

文藝春秋special

巻号頁・発行日

vol.10, no.1, pp.238-242, 2016

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

プレジデント社

雑誌

プレジデント = President (ISSN:00327751)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.53, no.27, pp.66-69, 2015-10-05

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

東海教育研究所

雑誌

望星 (ISSN:02889862)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.43, no.8, pp.33-40, 2012-08

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

日本印度学仏教学会

雑誌

印度學佛教學研究 (ISSN:00194344)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.60, no.1, pp.347-339, 2011

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

禅学研究会

雑誌

禅学研究

巻号頁・発行日

vol.90, pp.1-21, 2012-03-12

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

Japanese Association of Indian and Buddhist Studies

雑誌

印度學佛教學研究 (ISSN:00194344)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.54, no.2, pp.938-931,1331, 2006-03-20 (Released:2010-03-09)

---

At present we do not have a clear understanding of the historical process through which the existing Vinaya materials came into being. One of the most noteworthy points in this field is the difference in structure between Theravada Vinayas and the Mahasamghika Vinaya. It is thought that the compilation process of the Vinaya may be clarified by explaining the reason for this difference. On this point, scholars such as Frauwallner, Hirakawa, Yinshun, Clarke and myself have presented various theories. Clarke's theory, the most recent addition to the discussion, rejects the thesis of Frauwallner's famous work. If Clarke's criticisms are correct, then his interpretation is a revolutionary contribution to the study of the Vinaya. However, there is a serious logical contradiction in Clarke's theory, and therefore Frauwallner's theory cannot be dismissed. In this article, I will outline these past theories and point out the problems in Clarke's work.

著者

佐々木 閑

出版者

日本印度学仏教学会

雑誌

印度學佛教學研究 (ISSN:00194344)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.68, no.1, pp.456-450, 2019-12-20 (Released:2020-09-10)

参考文献数

9

---

The author has confirmed the validity of the claim that a monk is required to acknowledge his offense before he can be subject to any form of punitive legal action, focusing on the aniyata section, the third section in the Pātimokkha/Vibhaṅga of the vinaya. As a result of an investigation of sikkhāpada and vibhaṅga of the first aniyata section and the meaning of the tassapāpiyyasikā procedure which appears in the vibhaṅga of the rule, the following facts have come to light.1. The first sikkhāpada of the aniyata section of all of five vinayas except the Mahīśāsaka vinaya, a reduced version, can be interpreted either to mean, “a monk is required to acknowledge his offense before he can be subject to any form of punitive legal action,” or “the monastic community can take punitive legal action against a monk without his acknowledgement.”2. The vibhaṅga of four vinayas, that is, except the Mūlasarvāstivāda vinaya, adopt the former interpretation, and only the Mūlasarvāstivāda vinaya adopts the latter.3. The vibhaṅgas of three vinayas of the above mentioned four vinayas, the Dharmaguptaka, Mahāsāṃghika, and Mūlasarvāstivāda vinayas, introduce the tassapāpiyyasikā procedure, one of seven adhikaraṇasamatha-dharmas, as part of handling methods of aniyata. The tassapāpiyyasikā is a kind of punitive action performed by the Buddhist order against a monk who has made inconsistent allegations. Only adopting the former interpretation, the introduction of the tassapāpiyyasikā procedure can be contextually rational. No rational explanation can be possible in adopting the latter interpretation. Therefore it is inconsistent that the Mūlasarvāstivāda vinaya, which adopts the latter interpretation, contains the tassapāpiyyasikā procedure in its vibhaṅga.Based on these facts, the following conclusion can be drawn. It is inconceivable that the sikkhāpada of aniyata was enacted on the interpretation that “the monastic community can take punitive legal action against a monk without his acknowledgment.” Such an interpretation is unique to the Mūlasarvāstivāda vinaya. It is quite possible that the Mūlasarvāstivāda vinaya later introduced it in place of the traditional one, the former interpretation. Borgland’s idea that all vinayas hold in common the principle that the monastic community can take punitive legal action against a monk without his acknowledgment has to be reconsidered.