著者

ミシェル・フーコー著 ファビエンヌ・ブリヨン ベルナール・E・アルクール編 上尾真道 信友建志 箱田徹訳

出版者

河出書房新社

巻号頁・発行日

2015

著者

信友 建志

出版者

京都大学大学院人間・環境学研究科『人間存在論』刊行会

雑誌

人間存在論 = Menschenontologie (ISSN:13412698)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.24, pp.47-62, 2018-07-01

---

In this article, the author tried to reconstruct the notion of henology in the text of French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan. In 1970s, Lacan shifted his theoretical standpoint from "the Other" to "the One, " and corresponding to this shift, his clinical theory shifted from "the Symptom" to "the sinthome." The author investigated the roots of the henology in Lacan's text, and pointed out that from his early writings in 1950s, Lacan used the notion of "sign, " "trace, " which were supposed to be different from his famous notion "signifiant." In early and middle period, Lacan tried to dialectize this trace, and developed the dialect between the subject of the signifier and the subject of the enjoyment. But late Lacan tried to condense these element in relying on henological way of thinking, which was under the influence of one of his master, Étienne Gilson. The author concluded that this shift was the key for understanding of Lacan's notion, sinthome.