著者
松岡 健一郎
出版者
日本シェリング協会
雑誌
シェリング年報 (ISSN:09194622)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.28, pp.108-116, 2020 (Released:2020-10-13)

In 1802, Schelling and Hegel published a very polemical text “On the system of the absolute identity” in which Schelling stipulated that the absolute can be grasped only in the form of “antinomy”. This conception strongly influenced by Hegel demanded that Schelling revise his previous thought of total system in order to defend himself against some critiques Reinhold had stirred up. Schelling suggested his system of philosophy that had a new structure made of crossed antinomies, namely, antinomy between ideality and reality, and between correlation and indifference. He prescribed this structure as an “entrance” into his speculative idealism.
著者
松岡 健一郎
出版者
日本シェリング協会
雑誌
シェリング年報 (ISSN:09194622)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.26, pp.83, 2018 (Released:2020-03-21)

In den drei Rezensionen an den Werken Jacobis verwirft Friedrich Schlegel nicht nur den Indivi- dualismus oder Subjektivismus, in dem Jacobi versucht, eine unmittelbare Gewissheit durch „Salto mortale“ zu verteidigen, sondern auch die unrechte Fassung der göttlichen Offenbarung, aus der Ja- cobi von der religiösen Sache spricht. Diesem setzt Schlegel einen christlichen Gedanken, der Jacobi mangelt, und der durch „Herablassung des Gottes (zu Menschen)“ gekennzeichnet wird, entgegen und verweist auf einen neuen Anfangspunkt, aus dem „die christliche Philosophie“ Schlegels sich entwickelt und seine spätere Philosophie zu verstehen ist.
著者
松岡 健一郎
出版者
日本シェリング協会
雑誌
シェリング年報 (ISSN:09194622)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.24, pp.167, 2016 (Released:2020-03-26)

Friedrich Schlegel gives several philosophical lectures in Cologne on the assumption that the infi- nite has two conceptual figures, “infinite unity” and “infinite fullness”. In his lectures, there are two different contexts about these concepts and therefore two different entities referred by them. On the first context “infinite unity” and “infinite fullness” are referred to an original and primordial whole- ness of nature and its outside manifold. On the second context “infinite unity” and “infinite fullness” are referred to freedom of the Creator’s “overflowing love” and human’s prospective reflection of it. We can remark that these two concepts of the latter context contain Schlegel’s ethical and theological problematics and they suggest implicitly his own religious turn.