- 著者
-
藤本 定正
- 出版者
- 公益社団法人 精密工学会
- 雑誌
- 精密機械 (ISSN:03743543)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.37, no.434, pp.184-189, 1971-03-05 (Released:2009-06-30)
- 参考文献数
- 6
There are two kinds of worked surfaces turned with diamond tools. One of them is called iridescent surface and the other is called specular one. Moreover the iridescent surfaces are classified into glossy, ordinary, and white. The sections of turned surfaces have a periodic array of tri-angle which is made with feed of lathe and configurations of tools. It is made to examine the relation between the maximum heights of uneveness on the slopes of the triangular grooves (Umax) and the kind of turned surf aces.Some sumples are turned and the pitches and heights (Rmax) of the tri-angular grooves on them are constant but only Umax of them is changed. The Umax and the distributions of diffracted light intensity are measured with an interference microscope with total magnification 1000 times and an automatic recoding goniophotometer respectively. These samples are classified into each kinds of turned surfaces by 15 judges and the results are discussed with the observation of technique of sensory test.The classified kinds of iridescent surfaces are specular, glossy, ordinary and white according to ascending value of Umax. The psychological boundary between specular and glossy iridescent surfaces is definite comparatively, because only existence of iridescent light is judged mainly. The boundary is defined with the degree of smoothness of the slopes, in this case, it of Umax at a probability of 80% is 0.18μm. When Umax of a sample is smaller than 0.18μm, the sample is judged to be specular. The boundaries between glossy and ordinary, and white iridescent surfaces can not be defined. When the slopes are rougher than 0.40μm (in Umax), it becomes difficult to judge the intensity of iridescent light.