著者
藤枝 晃雄
出版者
美学会
雑誌
美學 (ISSN:05200962)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.30, no.4, pp.49-58, 1980-03-30

Modern art can be classified into two forms : art as art and antithetical art. The latter, which appeared for the first time in this century, is discussed in this paper. It has at times been regarded as modern art. Antithetical art, however, as the term suggests, is not self-sufficient but rather resultant from the preceding art. Marcel Duchamp, one of the first antithetical artists, has denied the possibility of defining art, but Joseph Kosuth in recent years takes an afirmative atittude and even demands to define it. In which points are these two proposals different from or similar to each other? We try to clarify the genetic conditions of antithetical art.
著者
藤枝 晃雄
出版者
美学会
雑誌
美學 (ISSN:05200962)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.22, no.3, 1971-12-30

One of the particularities of modern art is the trend that art exists not as art per se but as art about art. One example of this is "Urinal". which is comprehensible even if not seen. The recent trend, however, demands that the work which is made by the artist himself has to be seen and to be conceptualized later. The trend appears to have had its derivation in the virtual desintegration of space intrinsic to positive expression. Not having any purpose, it might be called "objective contradiction." The work finds its expression in space as a portion rather than a unified entity.