著者

鈴木 志乃恵

出版者

教育哲学会

雑誌

教育哲学研究 (ISSN:03873153)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1993, no.67, pp.27-32, 1993-05-10 (Released:2009-09-04)

著者

鈴木 志乃恵

出版者

教育哲学会

雑誌

教育哲学研究 (ISSN:03873153)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1989, no.60, pp.68-71, 1989-11-10 (Released:2009-09-04)

著者

鈴木 志乃恵

出版者

教育哲学会

雑誌

教育哲学研究 (ISSN:03873153)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1984, no.50, pp.79-83, 1984-11-10 (Released:2009-09-04)

著者

鈴木 志乃恵

出版者

教育哲学会

雑誌

教育哲学研究 (ISSN:03873153)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1973, no.28, pp.26-42, 1973-11-15 (Released:2010-01-22)

参考文献数

52

---

What is man - this question of anthropology is by no means an arbitrary or aimless one directed toward man, but since it is the fundamental and primary question, the author pursuing this problem by relying on Kant's philosophy intends to clarify somewhat further which problem lies at the basis of this question or must be studied necessarily in connection with it. If Kant's entire philosophy istaken for anthropology, two different kinds of anthropology can be distinguished, one belonging to the field of experience and the other one to the transcendental realm. By studying the structure of Kant's anthropology, the author intended to clarify the foundations of the origin of both types of anthropology and their mutual relationship. It is intended furthermore, to clarify the meaning of Kant's work Anthropology under a Practical Viewpoint, and the basis of Kant's view on education. Kant does not discuss anthropology as a mere instrument of pedagogy, but in his philosophy the possibility of education originates only at the moment when the foundation of a possibility of anthropology emerges. Hence, the study of anthropology was considered necessary to understand Kant's pedagogy.