- 著者
- 神坂 仁美 コウサカ ヒトミ Kosaka Hitomi
- 出版者
- 大阪大学大学院国際公共政策研究科
- 雑誌
- 国際公共政策研究 (ISSN:13428101)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.18, no.2, pp.139-156, 2014-03
There is a strong trend of adopting “complementary protection” as part of refugee protection policies in the world. Japan also grants so-called “status of humanitarian consideration” to those who fall outside the refugee defi nition under the Refugee Convention. In this paper, however, the author will argue that there is still much room for improvement in the complementary protection in Japan. By introducing international discussion on the “protection gap” and the impact of the 2011 revision of the European Union Qualification Directive, it will conclude that Japan must adopt a more advanced complementary protection policy to comply with the principle of non-discrimination.
- 著者
- 神坂 仁美 Kosaka Hitomi コウサカ ヒトミ
- 出版者
- 大阪大学大学院国際公共政策研究科
- 雑誌
- 国際公共政策研究 (ISSN:13428101)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.19, no.2, pp.37-53, 2015-03
There is a strong trend of adopting "complementary protection" as part of refugee protection policies in the world. Japan also grants so-called "status of humanitarian consideration" to those who fall outside the refugee definition under the Refugee Convention. In this paper, however, the author will argue that there is still much room for improvement in the complementary protection in Japan. This part (3), based on the discussion on the Non-Discrimination Approach and the implications of the revision of the EU Qualification Directive, concludes that Japan must adopt a more advanced complementary protection policy to comply with the principle of non-discrimination.
- 著者
- 神坂 仁美 Kosaka Hitomi コウサカ ヒトミ
- 出版者
- 大阪大学大学院国際公共政策研究科
- 雑誌
- 国際公共政策研究 (ISSN:13428101)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.18, no.2, pp.139-156, 2014-03
There is a strong trend of adopting "complementary protection" as part of refugee protection policies in the world. Japan also grants so-called "status of humanitarian consideration" to those who fall outside the refugee defi nition under the Refugee Convention. In this paper, however, the author will argue that there is still much room for improvement in the complementary protection in Japan. By introducing international discussion on the "protection gap" and the impact of the 2011 revision of the European Union Qualification Directive, it will conclude that Japan must adopt a more advanced complementary protection policy to comply with the principle of non-discrimination.