著者
SUMIKO HOMMA NAOKI MURAYAMA TATSUHIKO KODAMA NOBUHIRO YAMADA KEIICHI TAKAHASHI YASUSHI ASANO SAICHI HOSODA TOSHIO MURASE YASUO AKANUMA
出版者
Japanese Society of Nephrology
雑誌
日本腎臓学会誌 (ISSN:03852385)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.35, no.8, pp.999-1006, 1993-08-25 (Released:2010-07-05)
参考文献数
30

To study the metabolic abnormalities in familial lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) deficiency, the effects of a long-term, low-fat diet and LCAT replacement therapy on plasma lipids and apolipoproteins were investigated in a patient with LCAT deficiency. The patient had elevated triglycerides (TG, 543.7 mg/dl) and phospholipids (PL, 350.3 mg/dl) and normal total cholesterol (TC, 206.9 mg/dl). Change to a low-fat diet reduced TC and TG by 20% and 75%, respectively. These reductions occurred mainly in the d<1.006 fraction. At baseline, the patient had normal apolipoprotein B (apo B), low apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) and apolipoprotein A-II (apoAII) and elevated apolipoprotein E (apo E). Long-term treatment with a low-fat diet increased plasma apoA-I and decreased apo E. However, urinary protein excretion did not change throughout the observed period. LCAT replacement with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) after the low-fat diet further reduced plasma apo E to the normal range. These results indicate that the elevated plasma apo E in LCAT deficiency was related not only to the lack of LCAT in the plasma, but also to fat intake. A low-fat diet may be effective in correcting lipid abnormalities. Moreover, plasma apo E may be a good indicator of the efficacy of diet therapy.
著者
Yoshiki YUI Tetsuya SUMIYOSHI Kazuhisa KODAMA Atsushi HIRAYAMA Hiroshi NONOGI Katsuo KANMATSUSE Hideki ORIGASA Osamu IIMURA Masao ISHII Takao SARUTA Kikuo ARAKAWA Saichi HOSODA Chuichi KAWAI JMIC-B Study Group
出版者
日本高血圧学会
雑誌
Hypertension Research (ISSN:09169636)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.27, no.7, pp.449-456, 2004 (Released:2004-08-07)
参考文献数
19
被引用文献数
21 27

We stratified findings from the Japan Multicenter Investigation for Cardiovascular Diseases-B according to whether or not the patients had diabetes and compared the incidence of cardiac events occurring over a 3-year period between treatment with nifedipine retard and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. The primary endpoint was the overall incidence of cardiac events (cardiac death or sudden death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for angina pectoris or heart failure, serious arrhythmia, and coronary interventions), and the secondary endpoints were a composite of other events (cerebrovascular accidents, worsening of renal dysfunction, non-cardiovascular events, and total mortality). The results showed no significant difference in the incidence of the primary endpoint between the nifedipine group (n =199) and the ACE inhibitor group (n =173) in diabetic patients: 15.08% vs. 15.03%, relative risk 1.06, p =0.838. Also in nondiabetic patients, no significant difference was observed between the former (n =629) and the latter (n =649): 13.67% vs. 12.33%, relative risk 1.04, p =0.792. Similar results were obtained for the incidence of the secondary endpoints: in diabetic patients, 5.03% vs. 5.20%, relative risk 0.89, p =0.799; in nondiabetic patients, 2.70% vs. 2.47%, relative risk 1.07, p =0.842. Achieved blood pressure levels were 138/76 and 136/77 mmHg in the nifedipine group and 140/78 and 138/79 mmHg in the ACE inhibitor group in diabetic and nondiabetic patients, respectively. This study showed that nifedipine retard was as effective as ACE inhibitors in reducing the incidence of cardiac events in extremely high-risk hypertensive patients with complications of diabetes and coronary artery disease. (Hypertens Res 2004; 27: 449-456)
著者
Yoshiki YUI Tetsuya SUMIYOSHI Kazuhisa KODAMA Atsushi HIRAYAMA Hiroshi NONOGI Katsuo KANMATSUSE Hideki ORIGASA Osamu IIMURA Masao ISHII Takao SARUTA Kikuo ARAKAWA Saichi HOSODA Chuichi KAWAI JMIC-B Study Group
出版者
日本高血圧学会
雑誌
Hypertension Research (ISSN:09169636)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.27, no.3, pp.181-191, 2004 (Released:2004-10-19)
参考文献数
29
被引用文献数
70 103

The Japan Multicenter Investigation for Cardiovascular Diseases-B was performed to investigate whether nifedipine retard treatment was associated with a significantly higher incidence of cardiac events than angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor treatment in Japanese patients. The study used a prospective, randomized, open, blinded endpoint (PROBE) design. Patients were enrolled at 354 Japanese hospitals specializing in cardiovascular disease. The subjects were 1,650 outpatients aged under 75 years who had diagnoses of both hypertension and coronary artery disease. There were 828 patients subjected to intention-to-treat analysis in the nifedipine retard group and 822 patients in the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor group. The patients were randomized to 3 years of treatment with either nifedipine retard or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. The primary endpoint was the overall incidence of cardiac events (cardiac death or sudden death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for angina pectoris or heart failure, serious arrhythmia, and coronary interventions). The primary endpoint occurred in 116 patients (14.0%) from the nifedipine retard group and 106 patients (12.9%) from the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor group (relative risk, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.37; p =0.75). In the Kaplan-Meier estimates, there were no significant differences between the two groups (log-rank test: p =0.86). The incidence of cardiac events and mortality did not differ between the nifedipine retard and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapies. Nifedipine retard seems to be as effective as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in reducing the incidence of cardiac events and mortality. (Hypertens Res 2004; 27: 181-191)