著者
石澤 良昭
出版者
法華経文化研究所
雑誌
法華文化研究 = Jornal of Institute for the Comprehensive Study of Lotus Sutra (ISSN:02871513)
巻号頁・発行日
no.47, pp.1-9, 2021-03-20

In Cambodia's world cultural heritage of Angkor Wat, graffiti by Japanese visitors of the early half of the seventeenth century is seen to remain in fourteen locations, inscribed in India ink. Focusing on links between the India ink inscriptions and the illustrated ground plan of Angkor Wat, namely the so-called ''Plan of Jetavana'' which is a collection in the Tokugawa Museum (formerly Shokokan Museum) in Mito city, this paper probes the historical milieu at the time when Japanese worshipers visited Angkor Wat, on the flawed notion that it was Jetavana, a place sacred to Buddhism. Also, this is a checked article based on material issued on June 26, 2019, on the occasion of a special lecture held at the Ishibashi Tanzan Memorial Auditorium in the Shinagawa campus of Rissho University, at the Institute for the Comprehensive Study of the Lotus Sutra (co-sponsored by Rissho University's Faculty of Buddhism).
著者
三友 健容
出版者
立正大学法華経文化研究所
雑誌
法華文化研究 (ISSN:02871513)
巻号頁・発行日
no.33, pp.125-136, 2007
著者
三友 健容
出版者
立正大学
雑誌
法華文化研究 (ISSN:02871513)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.31, pp.1-68, 2005-03-20

The Abhidharmadipavibhasaprabhavrtti (ADV.) is quite a unique Sanskrit manuscript discovered from a Tibetan monastery. It has very important discussions between Mahayana and Sarvastivadin. Mahayana criticized the traditional school, Sarvastivadin as Hinayana (Inferior Vehicle). Traditional schools were, however, said to comment no word against Mahayana Nobody succeeded in translating ADV. into the modern language since Dr. Jaini published it in 1957, because this work requires us a sufficient knowledge on the Abhidharma theory using the commentaries kept in the Chinese Canon and the Tibetan Tripitaka. In this paper, the part (Verse No.298-382) of the chapter V of the ADV. is translated into Japanese with detailed footnotes.[Verse No.298-311] The fundamental principle of the Sarvastivada school, namely, the reality of the past and future elements, is discussed here examining four leaders opinion of the Sarvastivada school and the Parinamavada of Samkhya, the Guna of Vaiseshika. [Verse No.312-324] Dipakara criticizes the Darstantika who supports niratmaka (no intrinsic nature). The ADV. quotes Kumaralata's view supporting the Vaibha-shika viewpoint. It also examines the doctrine of Sunyatavada, and contains a valuable reference to the Tri-svabhavavada of the Kosakara, Vasubandhu who is described as a Mahayanist fallen from the Sarvastivada.[Verse No.325-359] The ADV. deals with different anusayas obtaining in different states of mind. The AKBh. is very brief and explains this point by way of an illustration of the sukhendriya. The ADV. devotes twenty-five verses to this topic.[Verse No.360-370] The ADV. devotes to the exposition of other klesas grouped as asrava, ogha, yoga, upadana, samyojana, bandhana and grantha.[Verse No.371-383] The upaklesas or minor klesas collected in the Kshdraka-vastu (corresponding to the Pali Khuddaka-vatthu-vibhanga) are dealt in the ADV-Vrtti. The AKBh. is very brief and mentions only three upaklesas. The last portions of this chapter containing details on the klesa-prahana and klesa-parijna are lost.