著者
小山 満 Mitsuru Koyama
出版者
創価大学シルクロード研究センター
雑誌
シルクロード研究 Silk road studies (ISSN:13455931)
巻号頁・発行日
no.9, pp.1-11, 2017

There are two current theories of the study for the bronze mirror dated the fifth year of Jian-wu. The one is the year 339 of Hou-zhao, the other is the year 498 of Nan-qi. The latter theory was convinced. The reason was pointed out about the letters Song-guo and Jin-hou described on the mirror. They were understood as the name of nations of China. However, Song-guo means the old Song county and Jin-hou shows a prefectural government in the history book "Jin-shu". Therefore, I understand that they do not become the grounds that show the year 498 of Nan-qi. As for the image of the mirror back, an inner ward is divided into three steps. The upper section is the scene of heavenly music. The middle section is the immortals of China. The right side is Xi-wang-mu and the left side is Dong-wang-fu. The lower section is described the King Huang-di and Lao-zi. The outside of the mirror is a scene of ascension. The image of the mirror both sides are related with the book "Bao-pu-zi" written by Ge-hong. The book was written 317 A.D. So we know the mirror should be produced in the near time. On the styles, there are already the same patterns from the Age of 3rd century, so I assume this mirror should not be the year 498 but should be the year 339 A.D.
著者
加藤 九祚 トゥルグノフ B. Kyuzo Kato Bahodir Turgunov
出版者
創価大学シルクロード研究センター
雑誌
シルクロード研究 (ISSN:13455931)
巻号頁・発行日
no.10, pp.31-40, 2017-02-28

Various kinds of artifacts were excavated by late Dr. Kyuzo Kato and Bahodir Turgunov of the Japan-Uzbekistan Joint Excavation Team at Dalverzintepa, an ancient city in southern Uzbekistan. The finds from remains of this city clarified importance of the Buddhism in the Kushan culture. These new finds are the last contribution to us that Dr. Kyuzo Kato, professor of Soka University brought, who initiated Japanese archaeological research in Central Asia and led archaeological excavations at Dalverzintepa, Karatepa and other sites for many years until his passing away at the age of ninety-four in Termez.
著者
田辺 勝美 Katsumi TANABE
出版者
創価大学シルクロード研究センター
雑誌
シルクロード研究 (ISSN:13455931)
巻号頁・発行日
no.10, pp.13-29, 2017-02-28

A Kushan princely figure (Fig.3) excavated at the sanctuary of Surkh Kotal situated in northern Afghanistan has not been identified as Kanishka I (127-150 AD) on the basis of persuading evidence nor as his deified portrait by many scholars although they associated the relevant figure with Kanishka I. However, in this paper the present author attempts to demonstrate that this statue is the very posthumous portrait of Kanishka I who was deified at the latest after his death in the reigning period of his successor King Huvishka (150-190 AD). The present author paid particular attention to the ivy scroll depicted along the center of the caftan depicted on that statue (Fig.3). The ivy symbolizes resurrection and eternal life in the next world to come according to Greek and Roman literal evidence and figural imagery of this plant as well as vine scroll. Ivy scroll design with heart-shaped leaves was widely diffused from the Mediterranean world to West, Central and South Asia including Gandhara as well as that of vine scroll in the first and second centuries AD. According to Kushan king’s images depicted on Kushan gold coins, the fashion of decorating vertically the central part of caftan with vine or ivy scroll came into vogue for the first time under the reign of the king Huvishka (Figs.7-9) who had succeeded Kanishka I, and also seems to have been deified because he is nimbate and haloed just like the nimbate Buddha image of free-standing and depicted on Gandharan Buddhist relief panels. That particular fashion of decorating caftan or tunic with floral pattern originated in Arsacid West Asia as is well attested to by the royal or aristocratic images excavated at Hatra and Palmyra (2^<nd>~3^<rd> century AD). That fashion must have been transmitted from West Asia to Central and South Asia through international trade between Parthian and Kushan empires. Taking into consideration these facts it seems quite probable that the enigmatic image of alleged Kanishka I (Fig.3) was produced during the reign of Huvishka rather than during Kanishka I was still alive. In other words, that relevant statue (Fig.3) is the posthumous portrait of Kanishka I and therefore most probably represents the deified Kanishka I installed by the order of Huvishka at the bagolango (temple) of Surkh Kotal that the victorious king Kanishka I had ordered to construct when he was reigning (232-150). As unfortunately the upper-body of this statue is missing, we cannot know whether it was nimbate or not. On the contrary to my interpretation, many scholars have not admitted the deification of Kanishka I on the basis that the epithet bago and deva applied to Kanishka I and Kushan kings do not necessarily mean god but king or lord. However, in the Surkh Kotal and Rabatak inscriptions, bago clearly means god, neither king nor lord. Furthermore, the epithet devaputra inscribed on the statue of Kanishka I (Fig. 2) excavated at the Mat shrine in Mathura, means ‘scion of god’, i.e., ‘epiphany of god’ just like the late Japanese emperor Showa was widely regarded and worshiped by the Japanese people as ‘living god’(現人神). The same holds true of the statue of Kanishka I (Fig. 3) excavated at Surkh Kotal. Although the statue of Kanishka I (Fig.2) from Mat might have been nimbate, we cannot verify the deification of that (Fig.3) of Surkh Kotal on the basis of divine circular nimbus deifying Huvishka on his coinage. However, it might be more reasonable to assume that both of them are deified images of Kanishka I judging from our above-developed investigation. To conclude, the ivy scroll depicted on the caftan of Kanishka I statue from Surkh Kotal was intentionally selected from among several floral decorative patterns then available in the East in order to symbolize and clarify not only the resurrection but also the deification of Kanishka I after death. In addition, the statue of Vema-Taktu (Fig.5) that might have been installed in the Mat shrine is probably his deified portrait. Lastly, the ivy scroll with cordiform leaves (Fig.3) and a row of heart-shaped leaves of ivy fit successively in a decorative band (Fig.6) are intimately related to Dionysos and therefore have a eschatological and soteriological connotation. That is the reason why both of them were applied for symbolizing the deification of the Kushan kings.
著者
小山 満 Mitsuru Koyama
出版者
創価大学シルクロード研究センター
雑誌
シルクロード研究 (ISSN:13455931)
巻号頁・発行日
no.10, pp.1-11, 2017-02-28

There are two current theories of the study for the bronze mirror dated the fifth year of Jian-wu. The one is the year 339 of Hou-zhao, the other is the year 498 of Nan-qi. The latter theory was convinced. The reason was pointed out about the letters Song-guo and Jin-hou described on the mirror. They were understood as the name of nations of China. However, Song-guo means the old Song county and Jin-hou shows a prefectural government in the history book "Jin-shu". Therefore, I understand that they do not become the grounds that show the year 498 of Nan-qi. As for the image of the mirror back, an inner ward is divided into three steps. The upper section is the scene of heavenly music. The middle section is the immortals of China. The right side is Xi-wang-mu and the left side is Dong-wang-fu. The lower section is described the King Huang-di and Lao-zi. The outside of the mirror is a scene of ascension. The image of the mirror both sides are related with the book "Bao-pu-zi" written by Ge-hong. The book was written 317 A.D. So we know the mirror should be produced in the near time. On the styles, there are already the same patterns from the Age of 3rd century, so I assume this mirror should not be the year 498 but should be the year 339 A.D.
著者
田辺 勝美 Katsumi TANABE
出版者
創価大学シルクロード研究センター
雑誌
シルクロード研究 Silk road studies (ISSN:13455931)
巻号頁・発行日
no.9, pp.13-29, 2017

A Kushan princely figure (Fig.3) excavated at the sanctuary of Surkh Kotal situated in northern Afghanistan has not been identified as Kanishka I (127-150 AD) on the basis of persuading evidence nor as his deified portrait by many scholars although they associated the relevant figure with Kanishka I. However, in this paper the present author attempts to demonstrate that this statue is the very posthumous portrait of Kanishka I who was deified at the latest after his death in the reigning period of his successor King Huvishka (150-190 AD). The present author paid particular attention to the ivy scroll depicted along the center of the caftan depicted on that statue (Fig.3). The ivy symbolizes resurrection and eternal life in the next world to come according to Greek and Roman literal evidence and figural imagery of this plant as well as vine scroll. Ivy scroll design with heart-shaped leaves was widely diffused from the Mediterranean world to West, Central and South Asia including Gandhara as well as that of vine scroll in the first and second centuries AD. According to Kushan king's images depicted on Kushan gold coins, the fashion of decorating vertically the central part of caftan with vine or ivy scroll came into vogue for the first time under the reign of the king Huvishka (Figs.7-9) who had succeeded Kanishka I, and also seems to have been deified because he is nimbate and haloed just like the nimbate Buddha image of free-standing and depicted on Gandharan Buddhist relief panels. That particular fashion of decorating caftan or tunic with floral pattern originated in Arsacid West Asia as is well attested to by the royal or aristocratic images excavated at Hatra and Palmyra (2^<nd>~3^<rd> century AD). That fashion must have been transmitted from West Asia to Central and South Asia through international trade between Parthian and Kushan empires. Taking into consideration these facts it seems quite probable that the enigmatic image of alleged Kanishka I (Fig.3) was produced during the reign of Huvishka rather than during Kanishka I was still alive. In other words, that relevant statue (Fig.3) is the posthumous portrait of Kanishka I and therefore most probably represents the deified Kanishka I installed by the order of Huvishka at the bagolango (temple) of Surkh Kotal that the victorious king Kanishka I had ordered to construct when he was reigning (232-150). As unfortunately the upper-body of this statue is missing, we cannot know whether it was nimbate or not. On the contrary to my interpretation, many scholars have not admitted the deification of Kanishka I on the basis that the epithet bago and deva applied to Kanishka I and Kushan kings do not necessarily mean god but king or lord. However, in the Surkh Kotal and Rabatak inscriptions, bago clearly means god, neither king nor lord. Furthermore, the epithet devaputra inscribed on the statue of Kanishka I (Fig. 2) excavated at the Mat shrine in Mathura, means 'scion of god', i.e., 'epiphany of god' just like the late Japanese emperor Showa was widely regarded and worshiped by the Japanese people as 'living god'(現人神). The same holds true of the statue of Kanishka I (Fig. 3) excavated at Surkh Kotal. Although the statue of Kanishka I (Fig.2) from Mat might have been nimbate, we cannot verify the deification of that (Fig.3) of Surkh Kotal on the basis of divine circular nimbus deifying Huvishka on his coinage. However, it might be more reasonable to assume that both of them are deified images of Kanishka I judging from our above-developed investigation. To conclude, the ivy scroll depicted on the caftan of Kanishka I statue from Surkh Kotal was intentionally selected from among several floral decorative patterns then available in the East in order to symbolize and clarify not only the resurrection but also the deification of Kanishka I after death. In addition, the statue of Vema-Taktu (Fig.5) that might have been installed in the Mat shrine is probably his deified portrait. Lastly, the ivy scroll with cordiform leaves (Fig.3) and a row of heart-shaped leaves of ivy fit successively in a decorative band (Fig.6) are intimately related to Dionysos and therefore have a eschatological and soteriological connotation. That is the reason why both of them were applied for symbolizing the deification of the Kushan kings.