著者
和泉 ちえ
出版者
日本科学史学会
雑誌
科学史研究 (ISSN:21887535)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.30, no.178, pp.97-106, 1991 (Released:2021-08-27)

The Mechanica reveals to us some of Aristotle's basic attitudes towards mathematica and physica. In Aristotle's division of knowledge, there seems to be a clear distinction between mathematica and physica, but in fact, these two kinds of knowledge have the common basis on Plato's five mathemata described in the Republic. Mechanical problems have something in common with both mathematica and physica, for the method is demonstrated by mathematica and its objects belong to physica Furthermore, mechanica relates closely to stereometria which Plato himself introduced in addition to the Pythagorean four mathemata, intending the reconstruction of those traditional tquadrivium, in his Republic. In the system of Aristotle's demonstrative science, mechanica connected with stereometria treats its object as a 'stereon' in motion. But in his ontology, the tstereon, means 'mathematical solid' which must be capable of perception. 'Moving stereon' means 'moving mathematical solid' and if this is restricted to the natural world, the objects of mechanica are metamorphosed into those of physica. Considering mechanica in this division of Aristotle's system, we can see the gradual transition from mathematica to physica. We recognize mechanica as the soil from which physica comes into existence.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

はてなブックマーク (1 users, 1 posts)

Twitter (1 users, 1 posts, 1 favorites)

たまたま見つけて読んでいた。プラトンとアリストテレスの「立体」についての立場の違いが面白い。 J-STAGE Articles - 和泉ちえ「"自然学・数学・メーカニカ" -アリストテレスを中心に- 」https://t.co/QJSR2f5UMv

収集済み URL リスト