著者
木原 活信
出版者
一般社団法人 日本社会福祉学会
雑誌
社会福祉学 (ISSN:09110232)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.32, no.2, pp.22-55, 1991-10-15 (Released:2018-07-20)

This Paper is about Addams' influence on the historical process of social casework through the progressive era (1900-14). That era was the time when social reforms were often carried out. So Addams, who was a leader of social reform, was able to be a "champion" among social workers. In contrast Richmond, who insisted on individual help (casework) rather than social one as a unit, disliked this era because Addams and her radical group considered Richmond's casework as useless. This situation caused two results. Firstly, in order to overcome the idea of Addams' social reform, Richmond had to explore an effective method of casework. As a result casework advanced to a scientific approach. Secondly, it is about the concept of social. From the first, Richmond did not have such an idea of social so much. So Addams criticized that point. As a result she gradually came to understand the meanings of social through the criticism from Addams. Consequently casework had become social casework with a scientific method as we know today

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (2 users, 2 posts, 14 favorites)

やはりリッチモンド研究は、日本においてそう多くはないと。しかしながら、美味しいところは、小松源助や杉本一義、近年では松原康雄等が、掘り尽くしている。 こりゃ誰かが例えていた「新潟で原油を掘り当てる」みたいなものなのかもしれない。 ぐぬぬ…前途多難だ。 https://t.co/5kxZhXpuqn

収集済み URL リスト