著者
渡辺 彰規
出版者
関東社会学会
雑誌
年報社会学論集 (ISSN:09194363)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2005, no.18, pp.264-275, 2005-08-05 (Released:2010-04-21)
参考文献数
25

This paper investigates how discourse as an analytical framework can be constructed in the development of Michel Foucault's analyses. By doing so, the paper argues that multiple frameworks exist in analysis using the discourse. Moreover, the paper shows that the analytical method used and the character of the discourse in question rely on the researcher's understanding of the mechanism of society, as well as on his attempt to strategize discourse as an analysis framework to better understand social phenomenon.Given these points, a discourse should be understood in relation to the object of analysis. Therefore, the methodological concern should shift from explaining the nature of discourse analysis to assessing the analytical feasibility of the discourse.

言及状況

外部データベース (DOI)

Twitter (2 users, 2 posts, 8 favorites)

#寝る前に論文読む https://t.co/DeMvts58JA 渡辺彰規(わたなべ・のりあき), 2005, 「ミシェル・フーコーにおける言説の諸性質についてーー〈言説分析〉から〈言説〉の諸分析へ」 フーコーの言説分析を3つに分類する。言説の自律性と決定性の違いの主張と、法則・権力・合理性の区分が見どころ。

収集済み URL リスト