著者
板橋 亮平
出版者
日本法政学会
雑誌
法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.45, no.1, pp.103-124, 2008-11-15

The purpose of this paper is to clarify the different views in Rawls's The Law of Peoples from Kant's Perpetual Peace. The reason why I write this paper is that Rawls says The Law of Peoples depends on Kant's Perpetual Peace and he himself doesn't indicate the different points. First, by comparing the international law with the law of peoples, I demonstrate that there are different points as to the theoretical construction between them. Secondly, I indicate that there is a different stance as to self-defense of war between them. Thirdly, I maintain that the political that Rawls thinks of is different from the political that Kant states. Fourthly, I emphasize that the relation the international law supposes is different from the relation the law of peoples supposes.

言及状況

Facebook (1 users, 1 posts)

板橋亮平さんってすげえ仕事してる(ように見える)な…。 「反照的均衡にかんする一試論 : 日本におけるジョン・ロールズ研究の分析と限界」http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110008440418 「政治的共生はいかにして可能か : ジョン・ロールズの政治的正義論」http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110004763513 「後期ロールズにおけるふたつのリベラリ ...

収集済み URL リスト