著者

村上 広樹 松木 建二 西嶋 寛 中西 誠 久門田 俊治 宮本 一民 大川 満

出版者

公益社団法人 日本口腔インプラント学会

雑誌

日本口腔インプラント学会誌 (ISSN:09146695)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.5, no.2, pp.240-249, 1992

---

We reported about mobility of implants by PERIO TEST^® (Part 1, 2) on SUMICIKON. We took many measurements of Bonefit bioinart implants with PERIO TEST^® (PT) by the same method. PT revealed that a relation between an implant and a bone can be understood by individual observation at chairside.<br/> Our Bonefit implant dates were reliable statistics, because we measured 205 cases. We had some interesting results about some methods. Those results were as follows;<br/> 1. Incisal lower edentulos arch use (n=19) PT average had the best level when compared to other methods.<br/> 2. Self-standing use (n=29) PT average had a good level but was impossible to use clinically.<br/> 3. Connected natural teeth and Molar lower arch use (n=113) was the most popular method in our experiments. The PT average was good. We thought, this method was safe and reliable.<br/> 4. Connected natural teeth and Molar upper arch use (n=41) PT average was alright for clinical use. But standard deviation was not better than the other methods<br/> 5. All experiments (n=205) PT average rose from immediate post operation to 30 days later. But it declined after 60 days later. The phenomenon was“ Tissue-integrate”.