著者

マジェッツ アグネシカ マジェッツ アグネシカ

出版者

総合研究大学院大学文化科学研究科

雑誌

総研大文化科学研究 (ISSN:1883096X)

巻号頁・発行日

no.9, pp.135-142, 2013-03

---

本調査はパイロットスタディーとして位置づけられ、ポーランド語のある単語をカタカナ表記に転写する際、音引きを使うべきか否かという疑問がきっかけで始めた調査である。日本語を母語とする話者に、アクセントのあるポーランド語の単語が長音として聞こえるのか、それとも短音として聞こえるのか、を回答してもらう実験をおこなった。その結果、サンプルの68%には長音を示す記号(音引き符号や拗音の小文字)による表記が適当であると見なされた。一方、大多数の被験者が短音として認識する例も少ないながら(12%)存在するということが判明した。 Is the generally accepted transcription of Polish words into katakana an optimal one? Could it be improved? Literature from many languages is translated into Japanese every year. Polish literature is not an exception. Proper names and certain words which are typical for Polish cannot be directly translated into Japanese and therefore are transcribed into katakana. In some cases of transcription the prolonged sound mark is used for certain sounds in Polish and in others it is not. Why is there such a difference in transcription of Polish language into katakana? Would it not be better to unify the transcription by establishing the rule of using the prolonged sound mark consistently or else removing it entirely from the transcription? This is a preliminary study which raises the question of how native speakers of the Japanese language perceive Polish lexical stress in the case of accented vowel duration and, by implication, whether or not it would be necessary to put a mark of prolongation in all transcribed words of Polish. To answer the question, ten native speakers of Japanese were asked to identify twenty-five sound samples with their various versions of transcription in katakana and to choose the version which is the most accurate one. The results show that the transcriptions without any mark of prolongation were recognized as the most accurate in 12% of the cases.