著者

古壕 典洋

出版者

東京大学大学院教育学研究科

雑誌

東京大学大学院教育学研究科紀要 (ISSN:13421050)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.51, pp.135-144, 2012-03-10

---

The purpose of this paper is to consider the nature of university correspondence education in the establishment of the period. I think if we consider the nature of university correspondence education, and it is inconsistent with freedom of teaching and learning this "schooling" we need to ask the principle and the relationship. However, in former research, the reason why "schooling" exists in the public education system of a university correspondence education is not clarified. I would like to consider how a university correspondence education and "schooling" had caught by the policymaker and a correspondence education actor. As a result of the study, university correspondence education institutions founded in the establishment of the period, the teaching and learning is a form of non-contiguously assumption that teaching and learning activities. Therefore, it is always "fatal weaknesses" and "intrinsic flaws" of structural problems, would more constantly summon new allegations. Therefore, I clarified that the university correspondence education has the nature for which what is contradictory to the free nature of its teaching and learning must be taken in.