著者
銅冶 英雄 村田 淳 浅野 由美 守屋 秀繁 吉永 勝訓
出版者
公益社団法人 日本リハビリテーション医学会
雑誌
The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (ISSN:18813526)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.44, no.5, pp.286-292, 2007-05-18 (Released:2007-06-27)
参考文献数
27
被引用文献数
1

The purpose of this study was to resolve the confusion existing in the terminology for describing foot motion, particularly the definitions of inversion and eversion. First, the definitions of foot motion used by the Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine and the Japanese Orthopedic Association were compared with those used by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and with those used by the International Society of Biomechanics (ISB), to identify agreements and differences. Next, the terminology utilized in the literature was explored by examining several major textbooks and related academic papers retrieved through a search of the PubMed medical literature database. In the definitions of AOFAS and ISB, inversion and eversion, which correspond to triplane motions in the definition used in Japan, were regarded as motions in the coronal plane. Terminology in the textbooks was very diverse. Of the 141 academic papers explored, 92 papers (66%) regarded inversion/eversion as coronal plane motion, and 4 papers (3%) regarded it as a triplane motion. In the remaining 43 papers (31%), the definition was unspecified. In academic articles addressing foot motions, to avoid confusion in terminology, the definitions of inversion and eversion need to be specified.
著者
橋本 光宏 小林 健一 岡本 弦 西垣 浩光 吉永 勝訓
出版者
社団法人日本リハビリテーション医学会
雑誌
リハビリテーション医学 : 日本リハビリテーション医学会誌 (ISSN:0034351X)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.38, no.11, pp.912-919, 2001-11-18
被引用文献数
5

手術を行った頸髄症56例に対し簡易上肢機能検査(STEF)を行い, 術前後の上肢運動機能を評価した.STEFは術前後で有意に改善し, 手術およびリハビリテーションの効果を評価するのに有用であると思われた.10項目の検査のうち特に検査8〜10において, 術前は低値を示したが, 術後の改善が著しかった.これらの検査は母指と示指による細かいもののピンチ動作を要求され, 手指の巧緻運動性を定量的に評価するのに有用であると思われた.STEFとJOA scoreの上肢運動機能項目は術前はSpearmanの相関係数0.70(p<0.01)にて, 術後は0.55(p<0.01)にて相関を示した.頸髄症の上肢運動機能評価において, STEFは客観的であり, 左右の上肢機能を別々に評価できるという長所がある.
著者
銅治 英雄 村田 淳 浅野 由美 守屋 秀繁 吉永 勝訓
出版者
社団法人日本リハビリテーション医学会
雑誌
リハビリテーション医学 : 日本リハビリテーション医学会誌 (ISSN:0034351X)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.44, no.5, pp.286-292, 2007-05-18
参考文献数
27
被引用文献数
1 1

The purpose of this study was to resolve the confusion existing in the terminology for describing foot motion, particularly the definitions of inversion and eversion. First, the definitions of foot motion used by the Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine and the Japanese Orthopedic Association were compared with those used by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and with those used by the International Society of Biomechanics (ISB), to identify agreements and differences. Next, the terminology utilized in the literature was explored by examining several major textbooks and related academic papers retrieved through a search of the PubMed medical literature database. In the definitions of AOFAS and ISB, inversion and eversion, which correspond to triplane motions in the definition used in Japan, were regarded as motions in the coronal plane. Terminology in the textbooks was very diverse. 0f the 141 academic papers explored, 92 papers (66%) regarded inversion/ eversion as coronal plane motion, and 4 papers (3%) regarded it as a triplane motion. In the remaining 43 papers (31%), the definition was unspecified. In academic articles addressing foot motions, to avoid confusion in terminology, the definitions of inversion and eversion need to be specified.