著者

安喰 勇平

出版者

一般社団法人 日本教育学会

雑誌

教育学研究 (ISSN:03873161)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.87, no.1, pp.13-24, 2020 (Released:2020-07-10)

参考文献数

25

---

教育学における他者論の一つの成果として、「~し直す」成長モデルが教育学において浸透している。ただ、「~し直す」成長モデルには、教育学における他者論に潜在していた自己矛盾の問題が十分に論究されないまま、依然として残されている。本稿は、バトラーとレヴィナスの受動的主体形成論に注目することを通して、教育学における他者論の自己矛盾のもたらす問題を克服する方法を提示する。

著者

安喰 勇平

出版者

中国四国教育学会

雑誌

教育学研究ジャーナル (ISSN:13495836)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.20, pp.1-10, 2017-03-20 (Released:2017-04-18)

参考文献数

20

---

In educational study, an encounter with the Other is seen as an important moment in ethical growth. Through the encounter, the Other is said to challenge one's existing identity and give one the responsibility to react ethically. A theoretical base of this is Emmanuel Lévinas's conception of subjectivity. Based on its interpretation, many theorists hold that Lévinas discussed the process of the production of subjectivity. Educational discourses on Lévinas, however, miss the fact that he avoided considering the production of subjectivity as a process and narrative. In this paper I aim to clarify the implication of Lévinas's conception of subjectivity for educational study. The first section explains the reason behind the application of Lévinas's conception of subjectivity to educational theory and shows the tendency of the application. Educational discourses on Lévinas's subjectivity have the tendency to focus on the openness and passivity of the self; thus, they miss the temporality. The second section clarifies how educational theorist Clarence Joldersma reconsiders the educational relationship by applying Lévinas's conception of subjectivity. To elucidate Lévinas's treatment of the production of subjectivity, the third section shows his attempt to discuss the production of subjectivity without narrative form. In the fourth section, it turns out that Lévinas allows various interpretations of his conception of subjectivity, and our interpretations complement his conception. His conception of subjectivity implies that educational theorists need to consider the self-contradictory character of an argument about the production of subjectivity.