著者

小柳 春一郎

出版者

獨協大学法学会

雑誌

獨協法学 = Dokkyo law review (ISSN:03899942)

巻号頁・発行日

no.115, pp.横77 (418)-横182 (313), 2021-08

著者

小柳 春一郎

出版者

日本法社会学会

雑誌

法社会学 (ISSN:04376161)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.2015, no.81, pp.105-116, 2015 (Released:2021-05-05)

---

In France, the fight against vacant houses (lutte contre le logement vacant) is a more and more important political issue, even though the vacant house rate is decreasing, from 7.0 percent in 2000 to 6.0 percent in 2010. The rate of house for secondary or seasonal use is slightly declining from 10.0 percent in 2000 to 9.8 percent in 2010. This is because the total population in France was rapidly increasing 6.7 percent during the 10 years. It recorded at 64.6 million people in 2010 from 60.5 million in 2010. The pressure of the growing population and the shortage of decent houses especially in large cities are the main reasons for the measures against vacant houses. The tax against vacant houses and the requisition of vacant houses are the two main axes of the legislative measures for the fight against vacant houses. The former is introduced by the Act against exclusion in 1998 and is related to the owners of the houses vacant for at least two years in the eight areas with more than 200,000 inhabitants. The 2013 reform expanded the implementation areas (from 8 to 28 areas) and raised the tax rate. The latter has a long history and was often implemented at the post-Second-World-War period. However, there has been a very rare case of application these days, due to the difficulties in detecting the vacancy. The underuse of house is theoretically permissible in the context of French Law. However, the concept of housing right plays an important role in restricting the owners’ property right.

著者

ルブール=モパン ナデージュ 小柳 春一郎[訳]

出版者

獨協大学法学会

雑誌

獨協法学 = Dokkyo law review

巻号頁・発行日

no.100, pp.横205 (198)-横222 (181), 2016-08

著者

小柳 春一郎

出版者

獨協大学

雑誌

基盤研究(C)

巻号頁・発行日

2011

---

日本の境界法理は,地籍境界を重視している。境界確定訴訟が筆界を明らかにし,地籍調査も地租改正にさかのぼる原始筆界の復興を目指す。問題は,地籍境界=筆界と所有権界との有機的関連がないこと,特に合意による解決が難しいことである。本研究は,フランス法では土地所有権界を中心とした境界法理があること,その境界確定訴訟は土地所有権界を明らかにするものであること,ナポレオン地籍に始まるフランスの地籍は,税の根拠となる点が中心であることを解明した。日本法においても土地所有権界を中心とした法理への転換の必要である。その際には,土地家屋調査士が,合意と筆界を結びつける役割を果たしうる。