著者
西 兼志
出版者
日本マス・コミュニケーション学会
雑誌
マス・コミュニケーション研究 (ISSN:13411306)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.69, pp.73-89, 2006-07-31 (Released:2017-10-06)
参考文献数
22

An Italian semioticien, U. Eco, advanced the distinction paleo-neo television in 1983. And it is in French context, which experienced the privatization of the television in mid-80's, that the distinction has been developed in various ways by researchers such as F. Casetti, R. Odin, D. Mehl, A. Ehrenberg, and so on. In this paper, their various approaches are presented critically from the viewpoint of the speech act theory. But at the same time, it is also an attempt to transform this linguistic theory into a general media theory, especially inspired by mediologie.
著者
西 兼志
出版者
日本マス・コミュニケーション学会
雑誌
マス・コミュニケーション研究 (ISSN:13411306)
巻号頁・発行日
no.69, pp.73-89, 2006-07-31

An Italian semioticien, U. Eco, advanced the distinction paleo-neo television in 1983. And it is in French context, which experienced the privatization of the television in mid-80's, that the distinction has been developed in various ways by researchers such as F. Casetti, R. Odin, D. Mehl, A. Ehrenberg, and so on. In this paper, their various approaches are presented critically from the viewpoint of the speech act theory. But at the same time, it is also an attempt to transform this linguistic theory into a general media theory, especially inspired by mediologie.