2 0 0 0 IR G・W・F・ヘーゲルのサヴィニー批判 : 実定法概念をめぐって
- 著者
- 西村 清貴
- 出版者
- 法学志林協会
- 雑誌
- 法學志林 (ISSN:03872874)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.114, no.1, pp.53-80, 2016-10
2 0 0 0 OA 19世紀ドイツ国法学における法と国制 -公共体と公権の関連を中心に-
2 0 0 0 OA パウル・ラーバントの国制論 : 『国法講義』を中心として
- 著者
- 西村 清貴
- 出版者
- 早稲田大学法学会
- 雑誌
- 早稻田法学会誌 (ISSN:05111951)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.58, no.2, pp.413-453, 2008-03-25
1 0 0 0 OA 一九枇紀ドイツ国法学における方法と国制
- 著者
- 西村 清貴
- 出版者
- 日本法哲学会
- 雑誌
- 法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.2008, pp.165-172, 2009 (Released:2021-12-29)
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the relation between legal methodologies and theories of constitution of C. F. v. Gerber and Paul Laband who are positivists of constitutional law (Staatsrecht) in the 19th century in Germany. Positivist theory of constitutional law and its view of state as artificial person are criticized for its formalism as outdated theory.But.in this paper. 1 will confirm that they tried to ensure that the juristic independence from other fields by limiting its object to description of national power. Moreover. I will insist following two points: (1) Gerber’s theory of status-constitution retreated as his legal methodology progressed. (2) the views about the national power in later Gerber and Laband corresponded with the modern constitutional theoretical model which distinguished state and society strictly. Finally I’d like to propose a more consistent alternative model.