著者

Kazuhiro ANDO Hitoshi HASEGAWA Bumpei KIKUCHI Shoji SAITO Jotaro ON Kohei SHIBUYA Yukihiko FUJII

出版者

The Japan Neurosurgical Society

雑誌

Neurologia medico-chirurgica (ISSN:04708105)

巻号頁・発行日

pp.oa.2019-0051, (Released:2019-07-04)

参考文献数

14

被引用文献数

10

---

We retrospectively reviewed the cases of three patients with infectious intracranial aneurysms (IIAs), and discuss the indications for surgical and endovascular treatments. We treated two men and one woman with a total of six aneurysms. The mean age was 43.3 years, ranging from 36 to 51 years. One patient presented initially with an intraparenchymal hemorrhage, one with mass effect, and the other one had four aneurysms (one causing subarachnoid hemorrhages and the other causing delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhages). The average size of all aneurysms was 12.2 mm (range, 2–50 mm). They were preferentially located in the distal posterior cerebral artery, and then, in the middle cerebral artery. All cases were caused by infective endocarditis. We selected endovascular treatments for five aneurysms and treated all but one within 24 h from detection. One aneurysm was treated by combined therapy with endovascular intervention and surgery. After treatment, none of the IIAs presented angiographical recurrence or re-bleeding. If feasible, endovascular treatment is probably the first choice, but a combined surgical and endovascular approach should be considered if surgery or endovascular treatment alone are not feasible. The method of treatment should be individualized. For cases with high risk of aneurysm rupture, treatment should be performed as soon as possible.

著者

Bumpei Kikuchi Kazuhiro Ando Yoshihiro Mouri Toru Takino Jun Watanabe Tetsuro Tamura Shinya Yamashita

出版者

The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy

雑誌

Journal of Neuroendovascular Therapy (ISSN:18824072)

巻号頁・発行日

pp.oa.2022-0047, (Released:2022-10-15)

参考文献数

30

---

Objective: Time to recanalization is directly linked to cerebral infarction prognosis. However, patients transferred from another hospital take longer to arrive than those transported directly. To minimize time to recanalization, the emergency room (ER) skip strategy for hospital transfers was executed and reviewed.Methods: From April 2019, patients transferred from another hospital for mechanical thrombectomy were carried into the angio-suite using emergency service stretchers. Results for these patients (ER skip group) were compared with those for patients transported directly to our hospital (Direct group).Results: Among 108 cases in 32 months, 99 patients (91.7%) had major cerebral artery occlusion and underwent endovascular treatment. No differences in age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, effective recanalization rate, or proportion of posterior circulation cases were seen between groups. The ER skip group (26 patients) showed significantly longer median time from onset to arrival (240 vs. 120 min; p = 0.0001) and significantly shorter median time from arrival to groin puncture (11 vs. 69 min; p = 0.0000). No significant differences were evident in time from groin puncture to recanalization (39 vs. 45 min), time from onset to recanalization (298 vs. 244 min), or rate of modified Rankin Scale score 0–2 after 90 days (42.3% vs. 32.9%). Median time from alarm to recanalization (266 vs. 176 min; p = 0.0001) was significantly longer in the ER skip group. Door-to-puncture (DTP) time for the Direct group gradually fell as the number of cases increased, reaching 40 min by the end of study period. In contrast, DTP time for the ER skip group remained extremely short and did not change further. The proportion of patients who underwent both CT and MRI before endovascular treatment was significantly lower in the Direct group (30.1%) than in the ER skip group (57.7%). In the ER skip group, median length of stay in the primary hospital was 119 min, and the median duration of interhospital transfer was 16 min.Conclusion: The ER skip strategy for patients transferred with large vessel occlusion achieved favorable outcomes comparable to that for direct transport cases. Direct transport to a thrombectomy-capable stroke center remains ideal, however, because the time to intervention is improving for direct transport cases each year.