- 著者
- Akihiro Karube Fumiko Saito Enami Nakamura Akihiro Shitara Natsuki Ono Megumi Konno Daisuke Tamura Daisuke Nagao
- 出版者
- THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION OF RURAL MEDICINE
- 雑誌
- Journal of Rural Medicine (ISSN:1880487X)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.14, no.1, pp.48-57, 2019 (Released:2019-05-30)
- 参考文献数
- 34
- 被引用文献数
- 9 15
Objective: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination was introduced in Japan in April 2013, as a national immunization program for girls aged 12–16 years, after an initial introduction in 2010 as a public-aid program for girls aged 13–16 years. The Yuri-Honjo district had the highest vaccine coverage among women aged 17–51 years in 2017, due to the original public-aid program. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in the vaccine types of HPV16/18 infections between 2008–2012 (pre-vaccine era) and 2013–2017 (vaccine era).Materials and Methods: We evaluated whether HPV vaccination was associated with a decrease in the prevalence of HPV16/18 and high-risk HPV and the incidence of HPV-associated cervical lesions. A total of 1,342 women aged 18–49 years, covering both the pre-vaccine and vaccine eras, who visited Yuri Kumiai General Hospital and underwent HPV genotype tests from June 2008 to December 2017 were compared.Results: Among women aged 18–24 years with higher vaccine coverage (68.2%), the prevalence of HPV16/18 and high-risk HPV decreased from 36.7% and 69.4%, respectively, in the pre-vaccine era to 5.8% and 50.0%, respectively, in the vaccine era (p=0.00013 and p=0.047, respectively). Among those with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2− and grade 2+, HPV16/18 prevalence decreased from 30.0% to 2.7% (p=0.0018) and from 81.8% to 36.4% (p=0.030), respectively. In this age group, the rate of HPV16/18 positivity decreased significantly. Among age groups with lower vaccine coverage, HPV prevalence did not significantly differ between the two eras.Conclusion: The prevalence of HPV16/18 and high-risk HPV significantly decreased in women aged 18–24 years, most of whom were vaccinated. HPV vaccination effectively reduced the prevalence of HPV16/18 infections in the Yuri-Honjo district.
- 著者
- Yusuke Morita Daisuke Matsubara Mitsuru Seki Daisuke Tamura Toshihiro Tajima
- 出版者
- Tohoku University Medical Press
- 雑誌
- The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine (ISSN:00408727)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.258, no.3, pp.177-182, 2022 (Released:2022-10-25)
- 参考文献数
- 14
- 被引用文献数
- 3
Perimyocarditis is a rare and serious cardiac complication following COVID-19 vaccination. Young males are most at risk after the second dose. With the introduction of the booster (third) dose, some reports have focused on the risk of perimyocarditis after a booster dose. However, no currently available report in Japan has comprehensively described this phenomenon. A healthy 14-year-old Japanese male, who had completed a two-dose primary series of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine six months prior, developed fever and chest pain within 24 hours after a homologous booster dose. He was transferred to our institute because of worsening chest pain. A multiplex PCR test showed no evidence of active viral infections, including SARS-CoV-2. Electrocardiography revealed ST-segment elevation in almost all leads, suggesting pericarditis. Echocardiography showed normal systolic function. Laboratory data demonstrated C-reactive protein levels of 8.8 mg/dL and elevated cardiac damage markers (troponin T, 1.9 ng/mL; creatine phosphokinase, 1527 U/L; MB isoenzyme, 120 U/L), suggesting myocarditis. He was diagnosed with perimyocarditis associated with the booster dose, which was confirmed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging four days after initial symptoms. Chest pain improved spontaneously along with a resolution of electrocardiographic findings and laboratory data within several days. He was discharged eight days after admission. Perimyocarditis is less frequent after a booster dose than after primary doses. In this case, the patient with booster-dose-associated perimyocarditis showed favorable clinical course without severe sequelae. The patient’s clinical course was consistent with findings on previous large-scale reports on primary-dose-associated perimyocarditis and case series on booster-dose-associated perimyocarditis.