著者
高井 弘弥 Hiromi Takai
出版者
武庫川女子大学
雑誌
教育学研究論集 (ISSN:21877432)
巻号頁・発行日
no.5, pp.27-32, 2010-03

Moral psychology has changed since Haidt (2001) proposed Social Intuitionist Model. In this study, using "trolley problems" (Petrinovich et al., 1993), the relation of intuitive system and reasoning system is investigated. At first, the subjects answered the questions including moral dilemma following their intuitions. But when they had time to considering the questions, their answers were such that using reasoning system. From these results, both two lines of judging moral dilemma, one following intuitions, the other using reasoning, are important in moral judgment.
著者
高井 弘弥 寺井 朋子 Hiromi Takai Tomoko Terai
出版者
武庫川女子大学大学院文学研究科教育学専攻『教育学研究論集』編集委員会
雑誌
教育学研究論集 (ISSN:21877432)
巻号頁・発行日
no.14, pp.17-25, 2019-03

Since Haidt's paper on moral judgment was published in 2001, studies of the development of morality have changed focus from Kohlbergian perspective to Haidt's moral intuition theory. The 'Trolley problem' is a symbolic moral dilemma, which reveals that moral judgments are mainly made on the basis of moral intuition, not on rational, cognitive thought. In this study, we made a moral dilemma of this kind, the moral intuition vs. utilitarian judgment, using everyday occurrences. And as a dependent variable, we used a slightly morally wrongdoing. We studied how the three independent variables, the moral intuition, empathy and the moral identity, affect this dependent variable. The results are as follows:1) If you can imagine victims of the wrongdoings easily, then empathy is a more effective inhibitor.2) If you can't, then the moral intuition is more effective.3) Moral identity plays important role in both wrongdoings.