著者

Masahiro YASAKA Kazuo MINEMATSU Takenori YAMAGUCHI

出版者

一般社団法人 日本内科学会

雑誌

Internal Medicine (ISSN:09182918)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.40, no.12, pp.1183-1188, 2001 (Released:2006-03-27)

参考文献数

21

被引用文献数

118 175

---

Objective To determine optimal intensity of international normalized ratio (INR) of warfarin therapy for the prevention of ischemic events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), we evaluated the risk of severe recurrent stroke, systemic embolism and major hemorrhagic complications according to INR and age. Methods We carried out the National Cardiovascular Center (NCVC) NVAF Secondary Prevention Study and analyzed data with those of Japanese Nonvaluvular Atrial Fibrillation-embolism Secondary Prevention Cooperative Study to elucidate relationships of major stroke and hemorrhage with INR and age. In both studies, all patients with cardioembolic stroke were given warfarin, monitored with INR every month, and followed up for primary endpoints of stroke and embolism to other parts of the body, and for secondary endpoints of major hemorrhagic complications requiring blood transfusion or hospitalization. We regarded ischemic stroke with NIH stroke scale (NIHSS) score >10 or systemic embolism as a major ischemic event and ischemic stroke with NIHSS score <10 as a minor ischemic event. There were 203 patients enrolled in total (152 men and 51 women). We investigated the relationship of occurrence of the events with INR and age, and calculated the incidence rates of major and minor ischemic events and major hemorrhagic events. Results During the mean follow-up of 653 days, major ischemic stroke and systemic embolism occurred in only 4 patients with INR <1.6, minor ischemic stroke in 10 patients with INR 1.50-2.66, and major hemorrhage in 9 patients with INR 2.30-3.56. Patients with major ischemic or hemorrhagic events were significantly older than those without any events (75±4 years vs. 67±7 years, p<0.001 unpaired t test). Incidence rates of any events at INR ≤1.59, 1.60-1.99, 2.00-2.59 and ≥2.60 were 8.6%, 3.8%, 4.9%, and 25.7%/year, respectively. Conclusions Major ischemic or hemorrhagic events occur often in the elderly NVAF patients, in whom an INR value of between 1.6 and 2.6 seems optimal to prevent such events.(Internal Medicine 40:1183-1188, 2001)

著者

Kentaro TAKANO Takenori YAMAGUCHI Kazuo MINEMATSU Tohru SAWADA Teruo OMAE

出版者

The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine

雑誌

Internal Medicine (ISSN:09182918)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.37, no.2, pp.141-148, 1998 (Released:2006-03-27)

参考文献数

43

被引用文献数

2 1

---

A diagnosis based on the presumed mechanism of stroke onset is useful for management strategies in acute ischemic stroke. Ninety-two patients with embolic (cardiac or artery-to-artery) and 107 with non-embolic (thrombotic or hemodynamic)stroke were diagnosed on strict cerebral angiographic criteria alone. To clearly discriminate between these two groups, the neurological and computed tomographic (CT) findings were then compared. Rapidity of onset, vomiting, urinary incontinence, level of consciousness, cervical bruit, anisocoria, tongue deviation, sensory disturbance, and CT findings (location of hypodense area, findings of brain edema and hemorrhagic transformation) were discriminatory factors between the two groups (p<0.01). According to these 11 items, we prepared a numerical table for quantitative differential diagnosis. A diagnostic accuracy of 98.9% for embolic and 87.9% for non-embolic stroke in internal verification, and 90.0% and 82.9%, respectively, in external verification was observed. The differences in clinical features and CT findings between embolic and non-embolic stroke may reflect the pathophysiological mechanisms of the occlusive process of cerebral artery as well as the extent and severity of ischemia.(Internal Medicine 37: 141-148, 1998)

著者

Takanari Kitazono Kazunori Toyoda Kazuo Kitagawa Takehiko Nagao Hiroshi Yamagami Shinichiro Uchiyama Norio Tanahashi Masayasu Matsumoto Kazuo Minematsu Izumi Nagata Masakatsu Nishikawa Shinsuke Nanto Yasuo Ikeda Toshiaki Shirai Kenji Abe Akira Ogawa PRASTRO-I Study Group

出版者

Japan Atherosclerosis Society

雑誌

Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis (ISSN:13403478)

巻号頁・発行日

pp.56093, (Released:2020-06-04)

参考文献数

19

被引用文献数

10

---

Aims: The efficacy of antiplatelet therapy may vary among different disease subtypes. Prasugrel is generally a more potent, consistent, and fast-acting platelet inhibitor than clopidogrel. This sub-analysis of the phase III comparison of PRAsugrel and clopidogrel in Japanese patients with ischemic STROke (PRASTRO-I) trial aimed to assess the differences in efficacy of these treatments for each stroke subtype. Methods: In the PRASTRO-I trial, a total of 3,753 patients with ischemic stroke were recruited from 224 centers throughout Japan and randomized (1:1) to prasugrel (3.75 mg/day) or clopidogrel (75 mg/day) for 96 weeks. For the sub-analysis, strokes were classified as large-artery atherosclerosis, small-artery occlusion (lacunar), stroke of other etiology, and stroke of undetermined etiology. The cumulative incidence of primary events (ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and death from other vascular cause) and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for each subgroup. Results: For patients with large-artery atherosclerosis, the primary event incidence was 3.8% in the prasugrel group and 4.8% in the clopidogrel group (HR 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45–1.40). For patients with small-artery occlusion, the incidence was 3.3% in the prasugrel group and 3.9% in the clopidogrel group (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.46–1.53). For patients with stroke of undetermined etiology, the incidence was 4.6% in the prasugrel group and 3.0% in the clopidogrel group (HR 1.56; 95% CI 0.90–2.72). The incidence of bleeding was similar across subtypes. Conclusions: Although statistical significance was not reached, the efficacy of prasugrel was potentially different between stroke subtypes, warranting further studies.

著者

Kazuo Kitagawa Naohisa Hosomi Yoji Nagai Tatsuo Kagimura Toshiho Ohtsuki Hirofumi Maruyama Hideki Origasa Kazuo Minematsu Shinichiro Uchiyama Masakazu Nakamura Masayasu Matsumoto for the J-STARS collaborators

出版者

Japan Atherosclerosis Society

雑誌

Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis (ISSN:13403478)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.26, no.5, pp.432-441, 2019-05-01 (Released:2019-05-01)

参考文献数

18

被引用文献数

17 24

---

Aims: To investigate the relative contribution of on-treatment low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and C-reactive protein (CRP) to the risk of recurrent stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) in patients with history of ischemic stroke.Methods: A total of 1095 patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke were randomized into two groups: control and patients receiving 10 mg of pravastatin per day. After excluding 18 patients who did not have baseline CRP data, the effects of LDL cholesterol and CRP on recurrent stroke and TIA were prospectively assessed in 1077 patients.Results: During the follow-up of 4.9±1.4 years, there were 131 recurrent stroke or TIA cases. Patients with ontreatment LDL cholesterol <120 mg/dL showed 29% reduction in recurrent stroke and TIA than those with LDL cholesterol ≥ 120 mg/dL (event rate 2.20 vs. 3.11 per 100 person-years, hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50–0.99, p=0.048). Patients with CRP <1 mg/L had 32% reduction compared with that of patients with CRP ≥ 1 mg/L (event rate 2.26 vs. 3.40 per 100 person-years; HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48–0.96, p=0.031). Although LDL cholesterol and CRP levels were not correlated in individual patients, those who achieved both LDL cholesterol <120 mg/dL and CRP <1 mg/L showed 51% reduction compared with that of patients with LDL cholesterol ≥ 120 mg/dL and CRP ≥ 1 mg/L (event rate 2.02 vs. 4.19 per 100 person-years; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31–0.79).Conclusions: The control of both LDL cholesterol and CRP levels appears to be effective for preventing recurrent stroke and TIA in patients with non-cardiogenic ischemic stroke.

著者

Shinichiro Uchiyama Takao Hoshino Hugo Charles Kenji Kamiyama Taizen Nakase Kazuo Kitagawa Kazuo Minematsu Kenichi Todo Yasushi Okada Jyoji Nakagawara Ken Nagata Hiroshi Yamagami Takenori Yamaguchi Pierre Amarenco

出版者

Japan Atherosclerosis Society

雑誌

Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis (ISSN:13403478)

巻号頁・発行日

pp.58552, (Released:2020-09-17)

参考文献数

22

被引用文献数

4

---

Aims: We have previously reported 5-year follow-up data on the TIAregistry.org, an international prospective cohort in patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke. We conducted a Japanese subgroup analysis because outcomes and predictors might differ according to ethnicities and regions. In this study, we compared the baseline and 5-year follow-up data of Japanese and non-Japanese patients with TIA or minor stroke.Methods: Patients with TIA or minor ischemic stroke within 7 days after the onset were classified into two groups based on ethnicity, Japanese (n=345) and non-Japanese (n=3502); further, 5-year event rates were compared between the two groups. We also determined predictors of 5-year stroke for both groups. Results: Vascular death and death from any cause were identified to be less prevalent, unlike stroke and intracranial hemorrhage, which was determined to be more prevalent in Japanese than in non-Japanese patients. Five-year rate of stroke was significantly higher in Japanese patients. Cumulative stroke and major cardiovascular event rates did not decline but instead linearly increased from 1 to 5 years in both groups. Baseline risk factors for 5-year stroke were as follows: age, diabetes, history of stroke or TIA, and congestive heart failure in Japanese patients. Independent predictors of 5-year stroke were large artery atherosclerosis, congestive heart failure, diabetes, and age in Japanese patients. Conclusions: Recurrent stroke and intracranial hemorrhage were determined to be more prevalent at 5 years after TIA or minor stroke in Japanese patients than in non-Japanese patients. Strategies to mitigate the long-term risks of stroke, aside from adherence to current guidelines, should take Japanese-patient-specific residual risks into account.